RE: centrally monitored "keylogger"
From: Atom 'Smasher' (atom_at_suspicious.org)
Date: 10/15/04
- Previous message: GuidoZ: "Re: Hard Drive data security"
- Maybe in reply to: tito.basa: "centrally monitored "keylogger""
- Next in thread: adisegna_at_siscocorp.com: "RE: centrally monitored "keylogger""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 13:57:40 -0400 (EDT) To: security-basics@securityfocus.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004, David Gillett wrote:
>> getting away with it is simple: the computers and network are owned by
>> the company and the company can do what they want with those assets.
>
> They are used in a workplace. US Labor Law (might not apply if you're
> not *in* the US, but there may be a local equivalent) includes
> provisions regarding privacy in the workplace, which ownership of the
> equipment DOES NOT trump. Make sure your company legal advisor has
> approved any plans to deploy something like this -- it's a whole lot
> cheaper than defending in a federal lawsuit, even if you eventually win.
===============
IANAL. TINLA.
US labor law is a joke.
as long as the computers are owned by the company and provided for the
purpose of performing work on the company's behalf, the company writes the
rules regarding how those computers are used. there may (or may not) be
disclosure requirements.
ever go to a casino? there's almost one camera for each square foot of
floor space (in an environment where millions of dollars of CASH is passed
every day)... what's being described is the computer equivalent, but i'm
not convinced that the cost:benefit ratio makes sense, especially when
other alternatives (human factors) are studied.
check with a lawyer.
- --
...atom
_________________________________________
PGP key - http://atom.smasher.org/pgp.txt
762A 3B98 A3C3 96C9 C6B7 582A B88D 52E4 D9F5 7808
-------------------------------------------------
"Beware, a record of the books you borrow may end up
in the hands of the FBI. And if the FBI requests
your records, librarians are prohibited by law from
telling you about it. Questions about this policy
should be directed to Attorney General John Ashcroft,
Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530."
-- Sign greeting patrons entering all 10 of
the county libraries in Santa Cruz, California
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.3.6 (FreeBSD)
Comment: What is this gibberish?
Comment: http://atom.smasher.org/links/#digital_signatures
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJBcA+YAAoJEAx/d+cTpVciWhQH/jMhk7J4yA8Gg3ruUIpOhniP
jSdRLYAkCnrt1AQ/OLmEEYU0jJUX+y9uNWX7zPOud11UKWz9NOrZgPDX/P2JI1M4
X5q/l1y9eedCssYOmpLtFwtbFf2q6hD1sj6I31M3paYbdedWaGTrZLblhl3521FC
3OqN2P1O4Edtsex89gjxdXiM4tjyNxtfNNuFxYOpzkyXGuxErpxpWDxAq79F2Qf3
YVmYi4bY2vNIbFLm+b5hbGyEshzagHutZDBn8OL0L7U2CIyNTQ79WHqC33u8XcXu
Ipv2eeSzHphSXKpe4UwfHF5MSHZcW5N11SZmnVFnW8vflDBfaRqIjUTYS1gPHns=
=WKQC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message: GuidoZ: "Re: Hard Drive data security"
- Maybe in reply to: tito.basa: "centrally monitored "keylogger""
- Next in thread: adisegna_at_siscocorp.com: "RE: centrally monitored "keylogger""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]