Re: TCP/IP CRC question
From: Jonathan Loh (kj6loh_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 10/06/04
- Previous message: Don Parker: "Re: Anyone know any good Assembly Language tutorials?"
- In reply to: Jorge Mendez Bonini: "TCP/IP CRC question"
- Next in thread: Shaineel Singh: "RE: TCP/IP CRC question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 13:15:20 -0700 (PDT) To: Jorge Mendez Bonini <jlmb@cableonda.net>, security-basics@securityfocus.com
So that the other layers can do validation checking. Speeds things up. So
everytime you see a packet you do not have to read the whole thing. You can
just read the header and if that's bad you know the whole thing is bad.
--- Jorge Mendez Bonini <jlmb@cableonda.net> wrote:
> I've been reading about the TCP/IP protocol stack (TCP/Ilustrated Vol1
> by Richard Stevens) lately and since Ethernet is quite common nowadays
> almost all link layer examples refer to it (I also checked Douglas Comer
> Internetworking with TCP/IP vol1).
> I tried searching RFC but found it very time consuming without good
> results (maybe I'm not used to it...yet)
>
> The Ethernet Frame contains a field known as FCS which contains a CRC.
> Now, my question is:
> If the CRC is generated from DATA field among others, What's the point
> of using checksums on the upper protocolos (IP checksums etc..)?
>
> Thanks for your time.
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
- Previous message: Don Parker: "Re: Anyone know any good Assembly Language tutorials?"
- In reply to: Jorge Mendez Bonini: "TCP/IP CRC question"
- Next in thread: Shaineel Singh: "RE: TCP/IP CRC question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]