Active Batch security safe or not ?

From: Anders Larsson (anders_at_dio.nu)
Date: 09/22/04

  • Next message: Prasanna M: "RE: Conferences..." 
    Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 09:40:11 +0200
To: Security Basic <security-basics@securityfocus.com>

    Hi!

    I wonder if it's safe to open for Active Batch (MS) ?
    it uses the port 3655. I have search and did not found so much info about
    it.

    Regards Anders

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Computer Forensics Training at the InfoSec Institute. All of our class sizes
    are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one
    interaction with one of our expert instructors. Gain the in-demand skills of
    a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by
    fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer
    crime and abuse so that it never happens again.

    http://www.infosecinstitute.com/courses/computer_forensics_training.html
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

  • Next message: Prasanna M: "RE: Conferences..."

    Relevant Pages

    • RE: Concepts: Security and Obscurity
      ... First I have to state an assumption of a single firewall in the cases mentioned as I fail to see why adding SPA to a dual layered authenticated system would be adding anything at all other than trouble with users. ... Subject: Concepts: Security and Obscurity ... You send me a SYN to a given port ... "If I take a letter, lock it in a safe, hide the safe somewhere in New ...
      (Security-Basics)
    • Re: Concepts: Security and Obscurity
      ... I send you an RST/ACK for that port ... An ACL saying traffic gets dropped or rejected to port X. So unless you have some revolutionary way to simply bypass firewall ACLs, you're basking in the darkness of futility here, my friend. ... so that you get 8*16 bits or 128 bits of security ... "If I take a letter, lock it in a safe, hide the safe somewhere in New ...
      (Security-Basics)
    • Re: More on garbage
      ... If we're talking about allowing port X inbound to host H, ... > program listening to port X on host H is safe. ... > you will make a mistake that damages security when using default deny. ...
      (sci.crypt)
    • Re: More on garbage
      ... If we're talking about allowing port X inbound to host H, ... program listening to port X on host H is safe. ... you will make a mistake that damages security when using default deny. ...
      (sci.crypt)
    • netstat makes a Firewall redundant?
      ... I see no output (other than 2 lines of 127.0.0 which is safe). ... Doing netstat regularly is ... If you want to close port 139, ... BTW, can someone list useful commands e.g. netstat, nbtstat, arp. ...
      (comp.security.firewalls)