Re: educating rDNS violators

From: Niek (niek_at_packetstorm.nu)
Date: 08/26/04

  • Next message: Richard Boswell: "Re: Blocking Access to Non-domain computers"
    Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 09:03:53 +0200
    To: security-basics@securityfocus.com
    
    

    On 8/25/2004 1:08 PM +0200, Derek Schaible wrote:

    > The way this helps spam reduction is that the vast majority of spam
    > comes from exploited machines running rogue MTAs or some script kiddie
    Correct.

    > on their DSL or cable modem. Such hosts will typically not have a valid
    > rDNS entry. Additionally, if a company is sending legitimate email they
    In my experience almost all 'western' isps have rdns set on their customer
    broadband/dialup ipranges. Sometimes an isp was assigned a new block,
    it can take a while, but it usually gets in place.

    Rdns is however missing on the majority of Asian ipblocks.
    I block China, Korea, and a few other countries with dns blacklists.
    90% of the blocked Asian ips do not have (valid) rdns.

    > will have no issues with you verifying their hosts in this manner. Many
    > spam attempts will spoof a name of an smtp server that most people will
    > allow. Adding rDNS stops this action.
    Names of smtp servers will still be spoofed even if rdns is in place.
    Only something like caller-id/sender-id/spf/domainkeys/'something better
    than before mentioned' solutions will help cut it down a bit.

    > Mail servers should have correct DNS info. Forward and reverse. It is
    > the sysadmin's responsibility to ensure that their systems are
    > configured properly. Period.
    Hail. Too bad most smtp administrators have no clue.
    They install sendmail/exchange/whatever, make sure it works, and never look back.

    > Of course, there are some companies with correctly configured DNS who
    > are spam friendly and this tactic will not block them. However, those
    > companies are few in comparison to the hacked/violated/kiddie machines
    > that will not have correct DNS info. These spam-friendly systems with
    > correct DNS info are trivial to black list.
    Already layed out, that this is not the case.

    > Hope this helps, too!
    >

    Moral of this all.
    If you decide to block hosts with missing or incorrect rdns,
    you will loose mail. Period.

    If you decide to block hosts with missing or incorrect rnds,
    you will still receive spam. Period.

    Regards,
    Niek Baakman

    -- 
    _______________________________________________________________________________
    Read about mime:         ( )                http://www.geoapps.com/nomime.shtml
    Read about quoting:       X     http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
    Read about disclaimers:  / \    http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Computer Forensics Training at the InfoSec Institute. All of our class sizes
    are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one
    interaction with one of our expert instructors. Gain the in-demand skills of
    a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by
    fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer
    crime and abuse so that it never happens again.
    http://www.infosecinstitute.com/courses/computer_forensics_training.html
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    

  • Next message: Richard Boswell: "Re: Blocking Access to Non-domain computers"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Reverse DNS
      ... SPAM filtering techniques ... total SPAM identification techniques, ... I've read that the practice of refusing mail based on not having RDNS has ... I removed my reverse DNS listing about two weeks ago and have had no ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.networking)
    • Re: Configure Exchange 2003 to reject if RDNS fails
      ... since I can't drop emails if RDNS fails I have tried blocking particular ... addresses where I know spam is coming from using the Connection filtering. ...
      (microsoft.public.exchange.admin)
    • Re: Final Words on "Educating RDNS violators" - Debunking the Myths
      ... it does tremendously aid in spam reduction ... rDNS test - stopping them from reaching the server. ... that virtually any filtering method has this possible side effect. ... is to demand proper service from your ISP in some manner. ...
      (Security-Basics)
    • How to do rDNS. WAS: RE: educating rDNS violators
      ... Just like to ask how does one implement rDNS from ... Or is it done from the DNS server? ... > catch the small bit of spam that hasn't caught up to the rest ... > We pointed our MX records to the filter then the filter would ...
      (Security-Basics)
    • Re: Own Public DNS Server
      ... SPAM detection software. ... most RR Biz RDNS shows IP.central.biz.rr.com or something ... At the same time, proper email headers, proper A/C/MX/Text records will ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)