RE: Would you pay more ...

From: Nick Benigno (NBenigno_at_atchealthcare.com)
Date: 07/06/04

  • Next message: Harrison Gladden: "Re: Would you pay more ..."
    To: security-basics@securityfocus.com
    Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 12:22:51 -0400 
    
    

    Pay more? Nah, instead they should offer each user a router instead of a
    modem as a preferred option. If security is in mind, the router could be
    pre-configured to limit the ports passed through, and a manual/tech support
    of the manufacturer should be supplied.

    Linksys routers can be placed after cable modems and dsl modems for a cheap
    price, by default restricting direct inbound access to the computer(s)
    behind it. If you wish to have more security, a firewall is of course the
    best way to go. To come up with just another profit scheme for ISP's to
    leach people for more money for safety is not what I like to hear.

    plus, as you are talking about common ports like FTP, SMTP, SHH, and WWW
    that are commonly used when exploiting a persons machine, so if you are
    talking about helping grandma's pc, it just doesn't work out exactly like
    you said.

    While you may block some trojans that operate on non-configurable ports not
    listed, it doesnt stop some of the most common things like the victim being
    abused as a fileserver, webserver(for further exploitation), and
    mailserver(spam).

    Also, IMO ISP's should have some sort of responsibility to inform users of
    basic security issues while connecting to the internet and using their paid
    services.

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Jeff [mailto:Jeff@Not_A_Real_Address.com]
    Sent: Friday, July 02, 2004 2:57 PM
    To: security-basics@securityfocus.com
    Subject: Would you pay more ...

    Regarding standard consumer broadband connections ...

    Would you pay more to only have the following destination ports open
    to the internet originating from your broadband modem:

          tcp 21 - ftp
          tcp 22 - ssh
          tcp 25 - smtp
    tcp, udp 53 - dns
          tcp 80 - www
          tcp 110 - pop3
          tcp 119 - nntp
          udp 123 - ntp
          tcp 443 - secure www

    (Arguments for/against specific ports solicited. I purposely left
    some out that I don't use. Curious how significant they are to
    others. IMAP4 and icmp protocols come to mind)

    ALTERNATIVELY, would you like it if this was the STANDARD package and
    additional ports were considered optional, and required payment.

    LASTLY, this could start out as the NEW Secure way to go! It simply
    requires that your existing cable modem be upgraded (replaced) at a
    cost of $50-$75. All new installations would recieve these as part
    of the std pkg.

    (I know some small businesses that would LOVE to have this. I know
    because they've called me to resolve some "weird problems" and look
    at me funny when I tell them that they should have had a firewall all
    along.)

    I would REALLY like to hear from those of you that work in the ISP
    field. I have always been on the receiving end of an ISP -- never
    worked in that trench. But I suspect that this type of firewall could
    be built into every single cable/dsl modem used at little expense.
    Indeed, could save lots of money on bandwidth.

    Consider Grandma now ... she typically isn't a gamer and need other
    ports open. Nor does she work at home and require a vpn. BUT she is
    the MOST likely to get hit by some exploit, and it's her damned box
    (x 1,000,000) uselessly eating up bandwidth because some smart-aleck
    *&#$ing script kiddie bas(*&#$

    .... ohm-yelli-mon ... ohm-yelli-mon ... OK, ok, better.

    Jeff

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Ethical Hacking at the InfoSec Institute. Mention this ad and get $545 off
    any course! All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 10 students or less
    to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.
    Attend a course taught by an expert instructor with years of in-the-field
    pen testing experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Master the
    skills
    of an Ethical Hacker to better assess the security of your organization.
    Visit us at:
    http://www.infosecinstitute.com/courses/ethical_hacking_training.html
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Ethical Hacking at the InfoSec Institute. Mention this ad and get $545 off
    any course! All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 10 students or less
    to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.
    Attend a course taught by an expert instructor with years of in-the-field
    pen testing experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Master the skills
    of an Ethical Hacker to better assess the security of your organization.
    Visit us at:
    http://www.infosecinstitute.com/courses/ethical_hacking_training.html
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------


  • Next message: Harrison Gladden: "Re: Would you pay more ..."

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Web server behind NAT?
      ... That is the LAN IP for the router, which allows you to use to the router's ... I don't know about an ADSL ISP, if the IP they assign to your modem changes ... port forwarded ports would not be mapped to the correct IP. ...
      (comp.security.firewalls)
    • Re: Downloadig patch...3 hours and not even close to being done
      ... >> If you are using a firewall, you will need to ensure that ports 6112, ... If you are using a router, ... Software firewalls = false security, ... Average users can just wait the time it takes, ...
      (alt.games.warcraft)
    • Re: REMOTE DESKTOP FRUSTRATIONS
      ... I've personally never had to open ports ... on the modem - just the router. ... so you fake a fixed address with DDNS. ... > router, the opening of the ports through the modem gets blocked. ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.work_remotely)
    • RE: Cannot set up 3rd-party ftp server on VISTA
      ... if something was up with the router or the cable modem. ... so no ports to be set there I suppose. ... And even when turning off the McAfee firewall, ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.vista.networking_sharing)
    • Re: DSL - A modem is a modem is a modem, right?
      ... Verizon DSL and discovered that the DSL modem was a one port router. ...  Not every router has room for 4 ethernet ports. ...
      (alt.internet.wireless)