Re: 192.168.x.x oddities

From: steve (securityfocus_at_delahunty.com)
Date: 06/16/04

  • Next message: shankarnarayan.d_at_netsol.co.in: "RE: Cisco Aironet Wireless Security"
    To: <hedgie@hedgie.com>, <security-basics@securityfocus.com>
    Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 13:26:12 -0400
    
    

    I'll hazard a guess that your ISP is also using the 192.168.x.x IP range to
    provide IPs to their cable modems. Your router is likely something like
    192.168.20.1 or something and then your cable modem is 192.168.100.123 and
    that is on your ISPs network.

    When you are pinging that IP you find that you think is outside your
    network, you are likely right that it is at the ISP but that is still not
    the Internet proper.

    If you do a trace route (tracert) to some website like securityfocus.com you
    might see your IP, your router's IP, your cable modem IP, then IPs on your
    ISPs network, then real ones.

    So probably don't fear that someone is lurking on your own home network.

    Hope this helps.

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Jimmy Brokaw" <hedgie@hedgie.com>
    To: <security-basics@securityfocus.com>
    Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 5:48 PM
    Subject: 192.168.x.x oddities

    This seems like a stupid question from a non-guru like me, but I've asked
    a couple of the "gurus" I know and gotten nothing but strange looks.

    I run a small network at home, using a wireless router to connect to a
    cable modem. My internal IPs all fall in the 192.168.0.x range, which is
    the only address-space the router is configured to support. I've got
    authentication and logging, so before anyone says "I bet it's a neighbor
    using your connection," I've verified nobody else is logging in.

    My understanding is that the entire 192.168.x.x range is for internal
    networks only (RFC 1918), and unrouteable on the Internet. When I run the
    following command, however, I can see several computers:

    [computer]$ nmap 192.168.*.* -sP

    I get what looks like four computers (in addition to mine), plus some x.0
    and x.255 addresses responding to the pings. I picked one at random, and
    it appears to belong to my ISP. Doing a traceroute, I found the packet
    reached its destination at a public (routeable) address, indicating to me
    the machine has two addresses on the same interface. RFC 1918 states:

       One might be tempted to have both public and private addresses on the
       same physical medium. While this is possible, there are pitfalls to
       such a design (note that the pitfalls have nothing to do with the use
       of private addresses, but are due to the presence of multiple IP
       subnets on a common Data Link subnetwork). We advise caution when
       proceeding in this area.

    Am I therefore correct in my assumption that the ISP is routing my pings
    onto their internal network? Is this a normal response? It seems like
    there ought to be security concerns here, but I can't nail them down,
    except the assumption that traffic destined for 192.168.x.x addresses may
    not be filtered as well (or at all), since it may be assumed it originated
    from within the internal network.

    -- 
       \\\\\                       hedgie@hedgie.com
      \\\\\\\__o   Bringing hedgehogs to the common folk since 1994.
    __\\\\\\\'/________________________________________________________
    Visit http://www.hedgie.com for information on my latest book,
    "Waiting for War," published by Aventine Press!
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Ethical Hacking at the InfoSec Institute. Mention this ad and get $545 off
    any course! All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 10 students or less
    to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.
    Attend a course taught by an expert instructor with years of in-the-field
    pen testing experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Master the
    skills
    of an Ethical Hacker to better assess the security of your organization.
    Visit us at:
    http://www.infosecinstitute.com/courses/ethical_hacking_training.html
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Ethical Hacking at the InfoSec Institute. Mention this ad and get $545 off 
    any course! All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 10 students or less 
    to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. 
    Attend a course taught by an expert instructor with years of in-the-field 
    pen testing experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Master the skills 
    of an Ethical Hacker to better assess the security of your organization. 
    Visit us at: 
    http://www.infosecinstitute.com/courses/ethical_hacking_training.html
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    

  • Next message: shankarnarayan.d_at_netsol.co.in: "RE: Cisco Aironet Wireless Security"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: IP address
      ... An Internet Service Provider such as RCN has no way of proving an ... If it's a cable modem, ... computer can only be truly identified if logs are kept by the ISP ... This means that any individual with a wireless enabled PC can ...
      (alt.computer.security)
    • Re: cable internet problem
      ... While Mike is right that your ISP should have provided clear, ... Control Panel - Network Connections. ... Refer the problem to your Internet Service Provider.. ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support)
    • Re: How to get my 2 ethernet cards to work
      ... If you have a cable modem that connects to an ethernet ... which connects to the internet. ... that with the almighty Linux, known to be a network OS, how could it ... > deeply wrong here and I need to fix it before taking a single step ...
      (comp.os.linux.networking)
    • RE: 192.168.x.x oddities
      ... The RFC 1918 space is not routable on the Global Internet, ... perfectly routable and often is used within an ISP or site. ... > and x.255 addresses responding to the pings. ... > onto their internal network? ...
      (Security-Basics)
    • Re: SuSE home network
      ... > 2000) connected to a cable modem. ... > up to four internet connections via dhcp. ... >From your ISP's network or from your own internal network? ...
      (alt.os.linux.suse)