Re: 192.168.x.x oddities

JGrimshaw_at_ASAP.com
Date: 06/15/04

  • Next message: Monty Ree: "Re: virus mail ignores MX?"
    To: hedgie@hedgie.com
    Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 14:04:38 -0500
    
    

    I once had a heck of a time connecting to a server of mine at home, which
    had the address 172.20.10.10. I could ping until I was blue in the
    face--it always came back. But I couldn't connect to the share, couldn't
    remote control it, nothing. The machine that I was on had a 192.168.1.x
    address, randomly assigned via DHCP (I have a few subnets for playing
    around in).

    When I went to the server to see if I could connect to a share on the
    client, I discovered the server was not even turned on!

    I did a trace route from the client and indeed, it went about 7 hops along
    inside my cable provider's network before coming to a halt--showing me a
    myriad of private networks on the way to the finish.

    So it is quite possible that your ISP has private networking enabled.
    Likely some of the addresses are what your cable modem/adsl modem receives
    it's TFTP connection from upon power up.

    "Jimmy Brokaw" <hedgie@hedgie.com>
    06/14/2004 04:48 PM
    Please respond to
    hedgie@hedgie.com

    To
    security-basics@securityfocus.com
    cc

    Subject
    192.168.x.x oddities

    This seems like a stupid question from a non-guru like me, but I've asked
    a couple of the "gurus" I know and gotten nothing but strange looks.

    I run a small network at home, using a wireless router to connect to a
    cable modem. My internal IPs all fall in the 192.168.0.x range, which is
    the only address-space the router is configured to support. I've got
    authentication and logging, so before anyone says "I bet it's a neighbor
    using your connection," I've verified nobody else is logging in.

    My understanding is that the entire 192.168.x.x range is for internal
    networks only (RFC 1918), and unrouteable on the Internet. When I run the
    following command, however, I can see several computers:

    [computer]$ nmap 192.168.*.* -sP

    I get what looks like four computers (in addition to mine), plus some x.0
    and x.255 addresses responding to the pings. I picked one at random, and
    it appears to belong to my ISP. Doing a traceroute, I found the packet
    reached its destination at a public (routeable) address, indicating to me
    the machine has two addresses on the same interface. RFC 1918 states:

       One might be tempted to have both public and private addresses on the
       same physical medium. While this is possible, there are pitfalls to
       such a design (note that the pitfalls have nothing to do with the use
       of private addresses, but are due to the presence of multiple IP
       subnets on a common Data Link subnetwork). We advise caution when
       proceeding in this area.

    Am I therefore correct in my assumption that the ISP is routing my pings
    onto their internal network? Is this a normal response? It seems like
    there ought to be security concerns here, but I can't nail them down,
    except the assumption that traffic destined for 192.168.x.x addresses may
    not be filtered as well (or at all), since it may be assumed it originated
    from within the internal network.

    -- 
       \\\\\                       hedgie@hedgie.com
      \\\\\\\__o   Bringing hedgehogs to the common folk since 1994.
    __\\\\\\\'/________________________________________________________
    Visit http://www.hedgie.com for information on my latest book,
    "Waiting for War," published by Aventine Press!
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Ethical Hacking at the InfoSec Institute. Mention this ad and get $545 off 
    any course! All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 10 students or 
    less 
    to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. 
    Attend a course taught by an expert instructor with years of in-the-field 
    pen testing experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Master the 
    skills 
    of an Ethical Hacker to better assess the security of your organization. 
    Visit us at: 
    http://www.infosecinstitute.com/courses/ethical_hacking_training.html
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Ethical Hacking at the InfoSec Institute. Mention this ad and get $545 off 
    any course! All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 10 students or less 
    to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. 
    Attend a course taught by an expert instructor with years of in-the-field 
    pen testing experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Master the skills 
    of an Ethical Hacker to better assess the security of your organization. 
    Visit us at: 
    http://www.infosecinstitute.com/courses/ethical_hacking_training.html
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    

  • Next message: Monty Ree: "Re: virus mail ignores MX?"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Outgoing POP3 email missing/lost/not received
      ... ISP's mail server instead of the domain name on the ... SUMMARY OF SETTINGS FOR CONFIGURE E-MAIL AND INTERNET ... Internet Connection Wizard. ... After the wizard completes, the following network connection ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
    • Re: Connect the SBS to a remote IIS for Internet Printing
      ... the server can access the Internet with no problems at all. ... Checking network connection, and after a few seconds it says The ... the problem is cause by the configuration of ISA. ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
    • Re: ISA 2006 Basic Configuration
      ... Why would we point Preferred DNS to itself? ... Configuring the Internal Network Interface ... In the Internet Protocol Properties dialog box, ... Select the Use the following DNS server addresses option. ...
      (microsoft.public.isa.configuration)
    • Re: SBS 2003 (no SP) - file saving over network suddenly very slow
      ... > resources turn to be slow in SBS 2003 environment. ... > the SBS server box? ... > Norton Internet Security, Norton System Works, and Norton Anti-Virus etc. ... > II Please ensure proper binding order of the network adapter cards. ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
    • RE: Server Re-Setup Help
      ... This newsgroup only focuses on SBS technical issues. ... If you setup network like above, ... server is transferred in internet since they have different public IP. ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)