RE: 802.1x and PEAP
From: Camillo Bucciarelli (camillobucciarelli_at_yahoo.it)
Date: 03/03/04
- Previous message: Aditya, ALD [Aditya Lalit Deshmukh]: "RE: security based on IP address"
- Maybe in reply to: Camillo Bucciarelli: "802.1x and PEAP"
- Next in thread: Camillo Bucciarelli: "RE: 802.1x and PEAP"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 11:02:35 +0100 (CET) To: security-basics@securityfocus.com
Thanks,
this is what I need to know.
I have another question: I need to use 802.1x in order
to enable the "broadcast key rotation"?
Camillo
--- shankarnarayan.d@netsol.co.in ha scritto: > The
Lines below have been pulled straight from the
> PEAP working draft. This
> clearly defines that the initial negotiation of the
> PEAP is as in the TLS -
> thus providing the necessary security.
> Hope this answers your question OR have I got it
> wrong - If you believe this
> is not the information that you were looking for
> request you to please
> rephrase your question
>
> Shankar
>
> Protected EAP (PEAP) Version 2 is comprised of a
> two-part
> conversation:
>
> [1] In Part 1, a TLS session is negotiated, with
> server authenticating
> to the client and optionally the client to the
> server. The
> negotiated key is then used to encrypt the rest
> of the
> conversation.
>
> [2] In Part 2, within the TLS session, zero or more
> EAP methods are
> carried out. Part 2 completes with a
> success/failure indication
> protected by the TLS session or a protected
> error (TLS alert).
>
> The PEAP conversation typically begins with an
> optional identity
> exchange. The initial identity exchange is used
> primarily to route the
> EAP
> conversation to the EAP server. Since the
> initial identity exchange
> is in the clear, the peer MAY decide to place a
> routing realm instead
> of its real name in the EAP-Response/Identity.
>
> In short, the first exchange is based on TLS where
> certificates are used
> much in the same way as that used in the EAP-TLS.
> The remaining information
> of identity etc is then pumped through the TLS
> tunnel. Hence, EAP-TLS may be
> one of the methods (actually the most common method)
> used to establish the
> tunnel (using certificates)
>
> Shankar
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Camillo Bucciarelli
> [mailto:camillobucciarelli@yahoo.it]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 3:46 PM
> To: security-basics@securityfocus.com
> Subject: 802.1x and PEAP
>
> Good morning,
> I'm looking for detailed information about the
> Protected EAP. I can't understand what the
> supplicant
> and Access Server use to establish the TLS tunnel.
> Here's an example:
>
> Authenticating Peer Authenticator
> ------------------- -------------
> <- EAP-Request/
> Identity
> EAP-Response/
> Identity (MyID) ->
> <- EAP-Request/
> EAP-Type=PEAP, V=0
> (PEAP Start, S bit set)
>
> EAP-Response/
> EAP-Type=PEAP, V=0
> (TLS client_hello)->
> <- EAP-Request/
> EAP-Type=PEAP, V=0
> (TLS server_hello,
> TLS certificate,
> [TLS server_key_exchange,]
> [TLS certificate_request,]
> TLS server_hello_done)
> EAP-Response/
> EAP-Type=PEAP, V=0
> ([TLS certificate,]
> TLS client_key_exchange,
> [TLS certificate_verify,]
> TLS change_cipher_spec,
> TLS finished) ->
> <- EAP-Request/
> EAP-Type=PEAP, V=0
> (TLS change_cipher_spec,
> TLS finished)
> EAP-Response/
> EAP-Type=PEAP ->
>
> TLS channel established
> (messages sent within the TLS channel)
>
> They exchange a server_key_exchange and a
> client_key_exchange used to derive the session key.
>
>
> It seems to me that the key exchange between the
> client and the server is done in clear text, but
> this
> means that I can actually sniff this exchange. Now,
> this seems not logical to me. Anyone here has any
> idea about "where" I am wrong ? Do the two elements
> hash in some way the keys ? Or, another
> possibility,
> do we actually have the client key encrypted with
> the
> public key that belongs to the server - that is of
> course available - and we have the server key *only*
> that is transmitted in clear text ? In the TLS
> protocol of course the two key are encrypted with
> the
> ublic key of the "other end". But in PEAP ?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Camillo
>
> =====
> Camillo Bucciarelli
>
>
>
>
>
______________________________________________________________________
> Yahoo! Mail: 6MB di spazio gratuito, 30MB per i tuoi
> allegati, l'antivirus,
> il filtro Anti-spam
>
http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/?http://it.mail.yahoo.com/
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Free 30-day trial: firewall with virus/spam
> protection, URL filtering, VPN,
> wireless security
>
> Protect your network against hackers, viruses, spam
> and other risks with
> Astaro
> Security Linux, the comprehensive security solution
> that combines six
> applications in one software solution for ease of
> use and lower total cost
> of
> ownership.
>
> Download your free trial at
>
http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/Astaro_security-basics_040301
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
=====
Camillo Bucciarelli
______________________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Mail: 6MB di spazio gratuito, 30MB per i tuoi allegati, l'antivirus, il filtro Anti-spam
http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/?http://it.mail.yahoo.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ethical Hacking at the InfoSec Institute. Mention this ad and get $545 off
any course! All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 10 students or less
to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.
Attend a course taught by an expert instructor with years of in-the-field
pen testing experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Master the skills
of an Ethical Hacker to better assess the security of your organization.
Visit us at:
http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/InfoSecInstitute_security-basics_040303
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message: Aditya, ALD [Aditya Lalit Deshmukh]: "RE: security based on IP address"
- Maybe in reply to: Camillo Bucciarelli: "802.1x and PEAP"
- Next in thread: Camillo Bucciarelli: "RE: 802.1x and PEAP"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|