Re: Encryption question

From: Hollis Johnson (hollis_at_cisco.com)
Date: 02/26/04

  • Next message: Gideon T. Rasmussen, CISSP, CISM, CFSO, SCSA: "Re: How to find a changing IP on ethernet network"
    Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 16:36:11 -0800
    To: Lars Georg Paulsen <maillist@braindead.nu>, "Preston, Tony" <Tony.Preston@acs-inc.com>, security-basics@securityfocus.com
    
    

    Lars. That's interesting. I always thought Priv/Pub keys had to be composed
    of two primes. If you "combine" them (i'm thinking p*q) the result is no
    longer prime -- although it may not be any easier to break -- Is that what
    you meant? or did you mean applying one then the other??

    Thanks for any additional info :-)

    Hollis

    At 07:17 PM 2/25/2004 +0100, Lars Georg Paulsen wrote:
    >The encrypted key you have made, is not valid. Bob can't decrypt the
    >messange with his public nor with is private.
    >
    >If alice sends a message to bob, and what him to be the only one to read
    >it, she will encrypt it with his public key. And to make sure bob can
    >trust the message, and tell for sure it's from alice, she will sign the
    >message with alice private key.
    >
    >What you think of, combinding a private key and a public to make a new
    >key, is the himlich method. The way describe above takes quite long time
    >to decrypt.
    >
    >Another scenarior, is to make to new keys that are identical.
    >This you do by combinding private keys and public keys.
    >Alice makes a new key with her private and bobs public key.
    >Bobs makes a new key with his private and alices public key.
    >The two new keys are now identical, can not be produced by any
    >outsiders.
    >
    >Hopes this answer a bit of your question.
    >
    >regards
    >Lars Georg Paulsen.
    >
    >On Tue, 2004-02-24 at 20:01, Preston, Tony wrote:
    > > Tony Preston
    > > Systems Engineer, AS&T Inc.
    > > Division of L3 Corporation
    > > (609) 485-0205 x 181
    > >
    > > I have what is a rather basic question... I probably am missing something
    > > so I thought I would ask here.
    > >
    > > Alice and Bob both have a public and private key.
    > >
    > > Alice encrypts her email to Bob using his public key. Sends the email and
    > > Bob decrypts it using his keys..
    > >
    > > Since both Bob and Alice's public keys are known, Why can't I take Alice's
    > > public key and create a key pair using any other private key. Now, I fake
    > > an electronic signature from Alice using the pair I created and send a
    > bogus
    > > encrypted message to Bob with my "fake" Alice signature. Bob checks the
    > > signature by using the public key and it is valid. Bob assumes the
    > message
    > > is from Alice...
    > >
    > > What prevents me from spoofing someone's electronic signature this way?
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    > >
    > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    > >
    > >
    > >
    >
    >
    >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    >----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------


  • Next message: Gideon T. Rasmussen, CISSP, CISM, CFSO, SCSA: "Re: How to find a changing IP on ethernet network"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Simple authenticated channel
      ... protocols (in this case, I assume Bob uses a DH keypair), followed by ... It is assumed Alice already has an authetic copy of Bob's public key. ... The attacker therefore does not hold k, ...
      (sci.crypt)
    • Re: PGP Lame question
      ... i think that given Q and Bob's public key, ... Q can be linked as encrypted to Bob ... can verify that Alice signed something somehow connected to Bob? ... Alice encrypts M with R and gets an output, ...
      (sci.crypt)
    • Idea for police-resistant protocol
      ... Alice has a private key for encryption, and Bob has the corresponding ...
      (sci.crypt)
    • Practical improvement of DH-ElGamal scheme
      ... Improving DH-ElGamal public key encryption scheme can be done in ... For person Alice: ... Linking between 2 persons (Alice and Bob): ... Attacking this encryption scheme: ...
      (sci.crypt.research)
    • Re: GPG
      ... In a practical sense, only Bob may decrypt ... Alice on the way to Bob and prevent it from reaching Bob. ... Alice may encrypt the message with Bob's public key, ... the others) before issuing their certificates. ...
      (comp.os.linux.security)