Re: Domain HiJacking by SPAMMERS
From: Michele Orsenigo (morse_at_divalras.it)
Date: 01/30/04
- Previous message: Sean Kelly: "RE: Worm.SCO.A (W32/Mydoom@MM) & NDR"
- In reply to: saliskor_at_cyberus.ca: "Domain HiJacking by SPAMMERS"
- Next in thread: Matt Atkins: "Re: Domain HiJacking by SPAMMERS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: security-basics@securityfocus.com Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 13:10:43 +0100
On Thursday 29 January 2004 16:45, saliskor@cyberus.ca wrote:
>
>
> The most serious problem is that the subject of the SPAM could cause
> a major public relations problem for the company, since it is mostly
> online-drug sales and private enhancements being marketed.
The idea is to digitally sign each mail with a private key belonging to
the mail server. Users will be trained to check it, in case of doubt,
aginst the public key published on the company's web site.
Whe are now going to complete the test phase.
-- Michele Orsenigo Responsabile Sicurezza delle Informazioni m(DOT)orse(AT)tin(DOT)it --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ethical Hacking at InfoSec Institute. Mention this ad and get $720 off any course! All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 10 students or less. We provide Ethical Hacking, Advanced Ethical Hacking, Intrusion Prevention, and many other technical hands on courses. Visit us at http://www.infosecinstitute.com/securityfocus to get $720 off any course! ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message: Sean Kelly: "RE: Worm.SCO.A (W32/Mydoom@MM) & NDR"
- In reply to: saliskor_at_cyberus.ca: "Domain HiJacking by SPAMMERS"
- Next in thread: Matt Atkins: "Re: Domain HiJacking by SPAMMERS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]