RE: compromised network
From: Raoul Armfield (armfield_at_amnh.org)
Date: 12/29/03
- Previous message: mike_at_genxweb.net: "Re: difference between ccsa 156-210 and 156-210.4"
- In reply to: Dana Rawson: "compromised network"
- Next in thread: Alvin Oga: "Re: compromised network"
- Reply: Alvin Oga: "Re: compromised network"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: "'Dana Rawson'" <absolutezero273c@nzoomail.com>, <security-basics@securityfocus.com> Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 12:30:04 -0500
Best bet is to reinstall OS and software from known good media and
restore data from backups
Raoul
:-----Original Message-----
:From: Dana Rawson [mailto:absolutezero273c@nzoomail.com]
:Sent: Friday, December 26, 2003 2:22 PM
:To: security-basics@securityfocus.com
:Subject: compromised network
:
:
:
:Not sure where to start except by saying that my servers and
:router were compromised. Have locked down both servers and
:routers (at least I have attempted to do so) but what is the
:best way to verify that there is nothing rogue left active on
:the servers? Also, is there any legal action I should take
:(i.e. Do I alert any authorities)? It appears that my network
:was targeted by a server in california and individuals from
:Australia, Netherlands and the US were connecting using it as
:an ftp server. Was actually named "Revenge Server".
:
:I just installed Ethereal and am currently capturing packets
:but am not really sure how to read this or if there is any
:easier way to monitor all things. ...And to actually know how
:to read it.
:
:Will I be able to retrieve ip addresses from packets to match
:activity on my syslog and identify rogue traffic?
:
:This is all new to me so I apologize if my questions don't
:make sense or my approach is illogical.
:
:---------------------------------------------------------------
:------------
:---------------------------------------------------------------
:-------------
:
:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message: mike_at_genxweb.net: "Re: difference between ccsa 156-210 and 156-210.4"
- In reply to: Dana Rawson: "compromised network"
- Next in thread: Alvin Oga: "Re: compromised network"
- Reply: Alvin Oga: "Re: compromised network"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|