Re: Protecting Home Machines

From: Don Voss (voss_at_albany.edu)
Date: 11/21/03

  • Next message: Guillaume Lavoix: "RE: Protecting Home Machines"
    Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 05:57:24 -0500
    To: "Cherian M. Palayoor" <cpalayoor@cwalkergroup.com>
    
    

    Cherian,

    Non trivial question. I have been trying to keep home laptops stable
    here also. The best I can do is some education. They are, for the most
    part personally owned .. or treated that way most times.

    If they bring them in for a dhcp connection in their offices .. I have
    to authorize the mac > ip to get them on .. thats when I patch, patch,
    patch .. + make sure virus protection is loaded, current. The patches
    should take care of the known .. the new ones we are all open to. We use
    norton corp version. This is where virus crosses over to worms .. I do
    not care to debate the descriptions .. hostile is hostile.

    I have a simple setup at home: cable modem .. a linksys .. closed down
    as much as I know how .. and the machines use it's nat. Currently
    patched and with norton material. Very non-tech users [my family] .. so
    far so good. I have considered something like this to recommend to
    faculty but they would not consider it .. the smart ones ask what I do.

    To roll a procedure out as a policy is the real question .. which I
    would like to hear what other larger places are doing. One would need to
    "own" the laptop .. vpn material ? virus protection, what else ? Can
    they be screened when it comes in and attach to a domain .. push
    patches, etc.

    /don

    Cherian M. Palayoor wrote:

    > I have a remote user whose laptop was severely infected by the trojans
    > MSBLAST & WiNSHOW.A.
    >
    > I reinstalled the OS on the machine following a complete reformat, and
    > installed an anti-virus with the latest update. I ran a complete scan on the
    > machine prior to shipping the machine back to the user.
    >
    > However as soon as the user took back the machine home, he was infected by
    > another worm (NACHI.A) within a few minutes of connecting to the internet
    > through his high speed cable modem. He swears that he had not downloaded
    > anything nor tried any removable media on this machine.
    >
    > Following a bit of research on the matter, I am now aware that it is possible
    > for machines to get infected on the fly especially through unprotected home
    > internet connections.
    >
    > The question is, "What do I do to prevent such occurrences which have
    > increased of late."
    >
    > My thanks in advance for any thoughts or words of advise.
    >
    >
    > CP
    >
    >
    > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    >

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------


  • Next message: Guillaume Lavoix: "RE: Protecting Home Machines"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Large ISP response to Code Red?
      ... > 'forced upgrade protection', ... > computers are unpatched for 14 days after release of a patch? ... of letting it apply the patches for exactly the reasons above. ...
      (Incidents)
    • Re: Temporary directory
      ... Who are you replying to? ... What is a patch? ... > there are 7 different patches shown. ... > can be used in connection with second part of my question? ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
    • Re: Temporary directory
      ... Who are you replying to? ... What is a patch? ... > there are 7 different patches shown. ... > can be used in connection with second part of my question? ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
    • 9_Recommended error codes (specifically return code 5)
      ... * "return code 2" indicates patches are already installed. ... * "return code 25" means a patches requires another patch that is not yet installed. ... With or without using the save option, the patch installation process ... Installing 114008-01... ...
      (SunManagers)
    • Re: This is [Re:] How to improve the quality of the kernel[?].
      ... The -mm kernel already implements what your proposed PTS would do. ... If patch have no TS ID, ... Thus i can apply for example lguest patches and implement and test new ... How many open source projects use Bugzilla and how many use the Debian BTS? ...
      (Linux-Kernel)