Re: military strike possible?
From: Barry Fitzgerald (bkfsec_at_sdf.lonestar.org)
Date: 10/29/03
- Previous message: Meritt James: "Re: military strike possible?"
- In reply to: Meritt James: "military strike possible?"
- Next in thread: Bruno G. San Alejo: "Re: military strike possible?"
- Reply: Bruno G. San Alejo: "Re: military strike possible?"
- Reply: David Gillett: "RE: military strike possible?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 09:55:37 -0500 To: Meritt James <meritt_james@bah.com>
Meritt James wrote:
>
>Going from the premptive strike philosophy demonstrated in Mideastern
>countries, what are your thoughts on a military strike against (as yet
>unseen) "cyberterrorists" a'la
>http://www.msnbc.com/news/985295.asp?0si=- if there were extranational
>agents tampering with identified components of the infrastructure to
>the extent that they were risking human life?
>
>
>
First and foremost, how do you attack someone when they:
A) Haven't done the deed and thus, are unidentified?
-and-
B) Haven't done the deed and, by any sane measure of justice, are not
guilty of anything?
These are the pretenses of the current pre-emptive strike philosophy.
It's success is, as of yet, in question. Unless its goal was to create
an escalating security situation in the middle east and to stir up a
hornets nest, then it was a massive failure.
That's why the only way that pre-emptive strike works is during the
first stages of an "attack". The initial transgression has to be
entered before a pre-emptive strike can be justified. Even then, I
shudder at the thought of military intervention in cyber affairs. These
are really criminal matters and thus should be handled by law
enforcement authorities. The military is a broadsword, not a scalpel.
Cyber affairs are, by definition, essentially domestic. If you were to
bring the military into this, that would be like making MP's patrol the
streets replacing police officers. That's a nice little inroad into
martial law and martial law is the first step into ensuring the
existance of a tyrrany. This has been true throughout history and with
any exception that I'm aware of.
Basically, no - bad idea, IMHO. :)
-Barry
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Forum Systems PRESIDIO: PGP / XML GATEWAY APPLIANCE
The Presidio integrates PGP data encryption and XML Web Services security to
simplify the management and deployment of PGP and reduce overall PGP costs
by up to 80%.
FREE WHITEPAPER & 30 Day Trial -
http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/ForumSystems_security-basics_031027
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message: Meritt James: "Re: military strike possible?"
- In reply to: Meritt James: "military strike possible?"
- Next in thread: Bruno G. San Alejo: "Re: military strike possible?"
- Reply: Bruno G. San Alejo: "Re: military strike possible?"
- Reply: David Gillett: "RE: military strike possible?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]