Re: military strike possible?

From: Barry Fitzgerald (bkfsec_at_sdf.lonestar.org)
Date: 10/29/03

  • Next message: marco misitano: "RE: a basic lesson in security"
    Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 09:55:37 -0500
    To: Meritt James <meritt_james@bah.com>
    
    

    Meritt James wrote:

    >
    >Going from the premptive strike philosophy demonstrated in Mideastern
    >countries, what are your thoughts on a military strike against (as yet
    >unseen) "cyberterrorists" a'la
    >http://www.msnbc.com/news/985295.asp?0si=- if there were extranational
    >agents tampering with identified components of the infrastructure to
    >the extent that they were risking human life?
    >
    >
    >
    First and foremost, how do you attack someone when they:

    A) Haven't done the deed and thus, are unidentified?

       -and-

    B) Haven't done the deed and, by any sane measure of justice, are not
    guilty of anything?

    These are the pretenses of the current pre-emptive strike philosophy.
    It's success is, as of yet, in question. Unless its goal was to create
    an escalating security situation in the middle east and to stir up a
    hornets nest, then it was a massive failure.

    That's why the only way that pre-emptive strike works is during the
    first stages of an "attack". The initial transgression has to be
    entered before a pre-emptive strike can be justified. Even then, I
    shudder at the thought of military intervention in cyber affairs. These
    are really criminal matters and thus should be handled by law
    enforcement authorities. The military is a broadsword, not a scalpel.
    Cyber affairs are, by definition, essentially domestic. If you were to
    bring the military into this, that would be like making MP's patrol the
    streets replacing police officers. That's a nice little inroad into
    martial law and martial law is the first step into ensuring the
    existance of a tyrrany. This has been true throughout history and with
    any exception that I'm aware of.

    Basically, no - bad idea, IMHO. :)

                 -Barry

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Forum Systems PRESIDIO: PGP / XML GATEWAY APPLIANCE
    The Presidio integrates PGP data encryption and XML Web Services security to
    simplify the management and deployment of PGP and reduce overall PGP costs
    by up to 80%.
    FREE WHITEPAPER & 30 Day Trial -
    http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/ForumSystems_security-basics_031027
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------


  • Next message: marco misitano: "RE: a basic lesson in security"