Re: protect MS Windows 95/98/Me

From: Tomas Wolf (tomas_at_skip.cz)
Date: 09/30/03

  • Next message: McGill, Lachlan: "RE: Locking down a stand-alone 2000 Server with Group Poicy"
    Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 23:53:02 -0500
    To: security-basics@securityfocus.com
    
    

    Hello,
     I couldn't find the real question, so I'll just try to react on what I
    see is the discussion about... I remember one free (windows natural)
    tool that can do some locking and policy enforcement -> POLEDIT.EXE. I
    remember playing with it for some time and using it for a library as the
    "lock-down" tool, since they didn't want to invest time or money... And
    it worked well enough... Even though, who knows what they are doing it
    is not a big deal. But that is my 1c shoot in the dark :-)
    Good luck -- Tomas

    Alexander Suhovey wrote:

    >It was long ago when I played with win9x last time, but if I recall
    >correctly, "Disable registry tools" policy in win9x only restricts ability
    >to run regedit.exe. There are other ways to edit registry:
    >- rename regedit.exe
    >- use reg files
    >- use third-party registry editing software
    >Correct me here if I'm wrong.
    >
    >
    >IMO only way to secure win9x box is to use custom boot loader and custom
    >shell plus physical security (locks on case, BIOS superuser password, maybe
    >no floppy/CD etc)
    >Also nobody mentioned FolderGuard [http://www.winability.com/folderguard/]
    >which (among other features) gives you something like NTFS' ACL for FAT.
    >
    >My $0.02
    >--Al
    >
    >
    >
    >>-----Original Message-----
    >>From: Spencer D'oro [mailto:sdoro@comcast.net]
    >>Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 7:33 PM
    >>To: 'Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers'
    >>Cc: security-basics@securityfocus.com
    >>Subject: RE: protect MS Windows 95/98/Me
    >>
    >>But if Registry editing is disabled on the machine for that user through
    >>system policies, then how do you disable it through registry? And what
    >>editor are you talking about? I don't know what you are referring too,
    >>but please enlighten us, because if there is a way to do it, I want to
    >>know.
    >>
    >>Regards,
    >>Spencer
    >>
    >>-----Original Message-----
    >>From: Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers [mailto:bugtraq@planetcobalt.net]
    >>Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 2:13 PM
    >>To: security-basics@securityfocus.com
    >>Subject: Re: protect MS Windows 95/98/Me
    >>
    >>
    >>On 2003-09-25 Steven A. Fletcher wrote:
    >>
    >>
    >>>This is not necessarily true. If Win9x policies are configured
    >>>properly, the users can be quite limited in what they can change, even
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>for the current session. It's just a matter of putting the proper
    >>>time and effort into it.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>All I need to disable any policy is an editor and regedit.
    >>
    >>Regards
    >>Ansgar Wiechers
    >>
    >>------------------------------------------------------------------------
    >>---
    >>------------------------------------------------------------------------
    >>----
    >>
    >>---
    >>Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
    >>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
    >>Version: 6.0.521 / Virus Database: 319 - Release Date: 9/23/2003
    >>
    >>
    >>---
    >>Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
    >>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
    >>Version: 6.0.521 / Virus Database: 319 - Release Date: 9/23/2003
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    >
    >
    >----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    >
    >
    >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    >----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------


  • Next message: McGill, Lachlan: "RE: Locking down a stand-alone 2000 Server with Group Poicy"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Backdoor.Nibu.E.
      ... all in safe mode. ... the registry keys shouldn't revert back ... >you've Ended the process in Task Manager if it's ... >>>>>Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
    • Re: Registry learn to edit
      ... | Your hint stinks. ... The more you know about the registry the better. ... |> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics)
    • Re: XP colorscheme detection Help wanted
      ... > Hi John! ... > if don't know how to read a key from the registry: ... >> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. ...
      (microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion)
    • Re: Registry learn to edit
      ... If you want to know how to search the registry, edit the registry ... this is the Basics News Group. ... |> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics)
    • RE: CDE not coming up
      ... maybe I dislodged something when I installed the drives. ... > Now what is interesing is that CDE comes up on FREJA but not ODIN ... > Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. ...
      (comp.os.vms)