RE: protect MS Windows 95/98/Me

From: Spencer D'oro (sdoro_at_comcast.net)
Date: 09/26/03

  • Next message: Batkin, Seva: "802.1x, IAS and SecurID"
    To: <steve@Lan.com.au>, <security-basics@securityfocus.com>
    Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 18:44:18 -0700
    
    

    That's way off-base, at least for 98. By setting system policies on the
    OS using POLEDIT and storing the config.pol file on the server, you then
    set restrcitive policies dependent on whatever ADM you use. You load
    Group Policies from within Windows components. And you set User-level
    access control to make authentication for ALL shares be done by the DC.
    If you have a large number of machines, and upgrading just isn't in the
    budget, then it is totally feasible to secure a 98 station. The 98 OS
    is not as of yet obsolete, IMO.

    Spencer

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Steve McLaughlin [mailto:steve@Lan.com.au]
    Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 2:23 AM
    To: security-basics@securityfocus.com
    Subject: RE: protect MS Windows 95/98/Me

    Yes, that's a very polite way of saying it.
    There is no security features in win9x OS. They are all totally unsecure
    operating systems. The security features within are totally flawed in
    all ways, there is no way of securing these operating systems.

    The solution is to upgrade to windows 2k or XP, using NTFS.

    There is no other way.

    Don't embarrass yourself wasting the organisations capital on totally
    obsolete and unstable operating systems.

    Consider the 9x OS Obsolete, upgrade to NT5 or 5.1. Don't bother even
    looking further into securing Win9x. It is a total waste of time.

    steve mclaughlin | enlite technologyR
    T 1300 135 251 | F +61 (2) 9402 8586
    E steve@Lan.com.au | W www.Lan.com.auT
    (MCP, A+, Network+, Server+)
     

    -----Original Message-----
    From: French, Mark [mailto:Mark.French@wellington.co.uk]
    Sent: Thursday, 25 September 2003 2:07 AM
    To: 'security-basics@securityfocus.com'
    Subject: RE: protect MS Windows 95/98/Me

    I don't know of any software, but in this situation, my hardware of
    choice would be SCISSORS. Cut the network cable, keyboard cable, and
    mouse cable.

    This is probably the only way that this level of security can be
    achieved in these operating systems.

    Mark

    (Sorry, I couldn't resist)

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Robert Reidenbach [mailto:pominciss@greendot.com.ph]
    Sent: 24 September 2003 06:25
    To: security-basics@securityfocus.com
    Subject: protect MS Windows 95/98/Me

    Hi everyone!
    I'm looking for a software that you can install on
    MS Windows 95/98/Me Machines that won't
    allow an ordinary user to install any programs or
    allow any virus to infect any files.
    Would anybody know what they call these programs
    and where to get them? Any kind of help will be
    appreciated.
    -Robert-

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------

    ---
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ----
    _____________________________________________________________________
    This e-mail has been scanned for viruses by MCI's Internet Managed
    Scanning Services - powered by MessageLabs. For further information
    visit http://www.mci.com
    ________________________________________________________
    The information in this message is confidential and may
    be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the
    addressee. Access to this message by anyone else is unauthorised. If you
    are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or
    any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited
    and may be unlawful.
    The registered office of Wellington Underwriting plc is
    88 Leadenhall Street, London, UK   EC3A 3BA.
    ________________________________________________________ 
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ---
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ----
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ---
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ----
    ---
    Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
    Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
    Version: 6.0.521 / Virus Database: 319 - Release Date: 9/23/2003
     
    ---
    Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
    Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
    Version: 6.0.521 / Virus Database: 319 - Release Date: 9/23/2003
     
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    

  • Next message: Batkin, Seva: "802.1x, IAS and SecurID"

    Relevant Pages

    • RE: protect MS Windows 95/98/Me
      ... as FoolProof can help make Win9x much more secure, ... There is no security features in win9x OS. ... there is no way of securing these operating systems. ... The solution is to upgrade to windows 2k or XP, ...
      (Security-Basics)
    • RE: protect MS Windows 95/98/Me
      ... Subject: protect MS Windows 95/98/Me ... as FoolProof can help make Win9x much more secure, ... There is no security features in win9x OS. ... there is no way of securing these operating systems. ...
      (Security-Basics)
    • RE: protect MS Windows 95/98/Me
      ... Subject: protect MS Windows 95/98/Me ... as FoolProof can help make Win9x much more secure, ... There is no security features in win9x OS. ... there is no way of securing these operating systems. ...
      (Security-Basics)
    • RE: protect MS Windows 95/98/Me
      ... tech savvy individuals, bypassing those policies ... Microsoft products) does not exist on Windows 9x ... > There is no security features in win9x OS. ... > operating systems. ...
      (Security-Basics)
    • RE: protect MS Windows 95/98/Me
      ... > tech savvy individuals, bypassing those policies ... may I say, obscurity without security, since there is no way (or no way I ... >> operating systems. ...
      (Security-Basics)