Re: Network scanning
From: Sebastian Schneider (ses_at_straightliners.de)
Date: 08/10/03
- Previous message: Birl: "Re: verifying an open or closed port on an ip address"
- In reply to: White-Tiger: "Re: Network scanning"
- Next in thread: Ethan: "RE: Network scanning"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: White-Tiger <white-tiger@rocketmail.com>, CHRIS GRABENSTEIN <LFGRABC@LF.VCCS.EDU>, security-basics@securityfocus.com Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 02:34:32 +0200
On Saturday 09 August 2003 17:18, White-Tiger wrote:
> I am sorry I got on this late... Some switches support
> eapol
be my guest ;-)
> that works with a radius server to auth mac address at port
> level before the switch will enable that port... I have
> done limited testing. If you unplug a live connect, not
> only will someone be calling saying that something doesn't
> work, but when they plug in there NIC the switch will see a
> new MAC and disable the port.
just if someone is currently using that port, he'd maybe upset
but if the port is not in use, nobody might even notice, that
there is someone doing some fancy stuff
>
> Some one can give some ideas about MAC spoofing, But
> doesn't the NIC give its real MAC to the switch while you
> are trying to spoof someone elses MAC?
but if you set up you're NIC to listening mode, i guess there
will be no communications thus the real MAC address won't
be transmitted. After analyzing broadcast traffic, I guess you
might have enough information to do MAC spoofing with an
accepted MAC address.
this is a big deal for wireless communications since most of
the available cards can be put into passive mode.
>
> if this is the case, then you can disable and port that is
> not a known MAC.
>
> I have a baystack450, and I can setup the MAC in each of
> the switchs, but that will be kinda hard to maintain. So
> I am looking at free radius for OpenBSD that supports
> eapol, so I can just setup a file with all allowed MACs.
>
> Hope this helps, sorry if someone already said this, I am
> a little late on the thread.
>
>
> WT
>
> --- Sebastian Schneider <ses@straightliners.de> wrote:
> > On Friday 08 August 2003 14:19, CHRIS GRABENSTEIN wrote:
> > > As far as the hard wires, I think the best solution is
> >
> > to search out those
> >
> > > unused ports and unplug them from the switch. They can
> >
> > be quickly
> >
> > > reconnected if needed, and you'll know about it.
> >
> > I guess you're actually aware, that not everyone is
> > locking up rooms
> > containing switches.
> > And just plugging out unused cables won't be sufficient,
> > since usually
> > I just can plug out any computer and plug in my own.
> >
> > > |-----Original Message-----
> > > |From: netsec novice [mailto:netsec9@hotmail.com]
> > > |Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 4:51 PM
> > > |To: security-basics@securityfocus.com
> > > |Subject: Network scanning
> > > |
> > > |
> > > |Are there tools out there that would allow system
> >
> > administrators to be
> >
> > > |notified when a new workstation attaches to a network?
> >
> > I'm
> >
> > > |thinking both
> > > |wireless and ethernet in this case. SNMP maybe? I am
> >
> > in a
> >
> > > |credit union
> > > |environment and my concern is that someone would be
> >
> > able to steal an
> >
> > > |existing jack or a jack that is not physically
> >
> > protected but
> >
> > > |live and be
> > > |able to capture traffic or do reconaissance. We don't
> >
> > have
> >
> > > |Wireless access
> > > |at this point but may look to it in the future. My
> >
> > only
> >
> > > |thought in that
> > > |case would be to encrypt all traffic since wireless
> >
> > security
> >
> > > |is a bit scary
> > > |at this point. Any ideas?
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> > >-
> >
> > --
> >
> > -----------------------------
> > straightLiners IT Consulting & Services
> > Sebastian Schneider
> > Metzer Str. 12
> > 13595 Berlin
> > Germany
> >
> > Phone: +49-30-3510-6168
> > Fax: +49-30-3510-6169
> > Mail: ses@straightliners.de
> >
> >
> > Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich
> > geschützte Informationen.
> > Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese
> > E-Mail irrtümlich
> > erhalten haben,
> > informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten
> > Sie diese Mail.
> > Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe
> > dieser Mail ist nicht
> > gestattet.
> >
> > This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged
> > information.
> > If you are not the intended recipient (or have received
> > this e-mail in error)
> > please notify the sender immediately and destroy this
> > e-mail. Any unauthorized
> > copying,
> > disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail
> > is strictly
> > forbidden.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>-
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
> http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
-- ----------------------------- straightLiners IT Consulting & Services Sebastian Schneider Metzer Str. 12 13595 Berlin Germany Phone: +49-30-3510-6168 Fax: +49-30-3510-6169 Mail: ses@straightliners.de Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese Mail. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Mail ist nicht gestattet. This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message: Birl: "Re: verifying an open or closed port on an ip address"
- In reply to: White-Tiger: "Re: Network scanning"
- Next in thread: Ethan: "RE: Network scanning"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
