Re: ARP Spoof Question
From: Martin Brecher (listuser_at_mb-itconsulting.com)
Date: 07/25/03
- Previous message: DownBload: "Re: Trusting localhost?"
- In reply to: The Fueley: "RE: ARP Spoof Question"
- Next in thread: Justin Pryzby: "Re: ARP Spoof Question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 19:33:23 +0200 To: The Fueley <TheFueley@satx.rr.com>
The Fueley wrote:
>
> How would that apply to a layer 3 switch/router? Actually the packaging says
> that I have a Residential Gateway/Router/Firewall. Aren't gateways layer 7
> devices? While switches are layer 2 devices, they deal with MAC addresses
> right? Maybe a "smart" switch knows which MAC addresses are allowed on the
> network? Or am I missing it all here?
Most modern managed switches allow you to limit the number of MAC
addresses the switch learns on each port. This way you can assign a
specific NIC to a sepcific switch port, as well as disallow any unwanted
traffic.
Cabletron (now Enterasys) had a nice technique known as
SecureFastSwitching (which is nowadays partially resembled by the VLAN,
Link Aggregation and STP standards), which made some decent VLANing
possible.
For example:
VLAN #1 with all corporate-public servers and VLAN #2 with all the
confidential servers.
When a new station gets deployed it gets added to VLAN #1 by the IT staff.
All unknown stations are completely kept of the network.
Only people with a higher clearance level (i.e. the managers who need
access to the confidential finance server) get added to VLAN#2.
Other ideas are to keep the switches own network-accessible management
ports in another VLAN only accessible by the IT staff. And another VLAN
for the Quake servers, of course :-)
Greetings,
Martin
-- "History has shown us, that strength may be useless, when faced with terrorism." -- Jean-Luc Picard PGP/GPG key at http://www.stupid-design.com/martin/publickey.asc --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message: DownBload: "Re: Trusting localhost?"
- In reply to: The Fueley: "RE: ARP Spoof Question"
- Next in thread: Justin Pryzby: "Re: ARP Spoof Question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|