Re: Firewall Comparisons
salgak_at_speakeasy.net
Date: 07/03/03
- Previous message: Tim Greer: "Re: Ten least secure programs"
- Maybe in reply to: salgak_at_speakeasy.net: "Re: Firewall Comparisons"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: "Matt Stern" <sternm@comprehensive.com>, salgak@speakeasy.net Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2003 19:37:23 +0000
-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Stern [mailto:sternm@comprehensive.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 3, 2003 06:45 PM
To: salgak@speakeasy.net
Cc: 'Joseph', security-basics@securityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Firewall Comparisons
>Hmm.
>Please give some reasons why you don't like Sonicwall products. I have 4of >them and find them good (but not much to compare with others), and >severalclients and other VARs that are happy with them.
I already did. .
>Someone in the group mentioned power-supply-cable problems, but that seemsto >be solved.
No, I mentioned internal power connection problems on SOHO/Tele2s, and a problem they never DID figure out on a Pro-VX. I also found their support a bit lacking. This was all 2000-2001 timeframe, they might well have improved. . . but they lost a customer with how they performed, support and hardware-wise
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Evaluating SSL VPNs' Consider NEOTERIS, chosen as leader by top analysts!
The Gartner Group just put Neoteris in the top of its Magic Quadrant,
while InStat has confirmed Neoteris as the leader in marketshare.
Find out why, and see how you can get plug-n-play secure remote access in
about an hour, with no client, server changes, or ongoing maintenance.
Visit us at: http://www.neoteris.com/promos/sf-6-9.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message: Tim Greer: "Re: Ten least secure programs"
- Maybe in reply to: salgak_at_speakeasy.net: "Re: Firewall Comparisons"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|