RE: sshd for windows

From: DeGennaro, Gregory (Gregory_DeGennaro_at_csaa.com)
Date: 06/19/03

  • Next message: Peter Pekala: "Re: DMZ, Tape Backup and Security"
    To: Chris Berry <compjma@hotmail.com>, security-basics@securityfocus.com
    Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 09:03:53 -0700
    
    

    (or both if you're really paranoid.) << Talking about slow?! ... LOL ...

    Double 3DES Tunnels (SSH and VPN) ... Let's see, that is up to 68% reduction
    in bandwidth, plus the overhead that VNC has. That would be quite
    interesting?

    Definitely more secure than usual!

    Maybe all SMP machines and an OC-3 or LAN, then maybe you will have decent
    speeds and usability... :-D

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Chris Berry [mailto:compjma@hotmail.com]
    Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 4:55 PM
    To: security-basics@securityfocus.com
    Subject: RE: sshd for windows

    >From: "Depp, Dennis M." <deppdm@ornl.gov>
    >I really like VNC, but it has little security and no encryption.

    Which is why you pipe it through SSH or a VPN. (or both if you're really
    paranoid.)

    Chris Berry
    compjma@hotmail.com
    Systems Administrator
    JM Associates

    "

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Evaluating SSL VPNs' Consider NEOTERIS, chosen as leader by top analysts!
    The Gartner Group just put Neoteris in the top of its Magic Quadrant,
    while InStat has confirmed Neoteris as the leader in marketshare.
         
    Find out why, and see how you can get plug-n-play secure remote access in
    about an hour, with no client, server changes, or ongoing maintenance.
              
    Visit us at: http://www.neoteris.com/promos/sf-6-9.htm
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------


  • Next message: Peter Pekala: "Re: DMZ, Tape Backup and Security"