Re: Cable Vs. DSL

From: Christopher Nehren (apeiron@comcast.net)
Date: 04/21/03

  • Next message: David Gillett: "RE: Cable Vs. DSL"
    Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 13:08:21 -0400
    From: Christopher Nehren <apeiron@comcast.net>
    To: "Hornat, Charles" <Charles_Hornat@standardandpoors.com>
    
    
    

    On Mon, 2003-04-21 at 11:42, Hornat, Charles wrote:
    > Which is more secure?

    ^ Such questions as this beg for worthless flame wars. Anything is only
    as secure as the administrator makes it. Get the service for what it
    provides you, and then work on security (the more important thing
    anyway) on your own. Remember, service x might be less secure than
    service y, but they both have to go through a hardware step to get to
    your computer. That gives you the opportunity to secure your system on
    your own, so do take advantage thereof.

    
    



  • Next message: David Gillett: "RE: Cable Vs. DSL"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Prince Harrys children?
      ... The reason the Brits who hate Charles hate Charles is ... years such as Rudolf (Habsburg), Otto, Alexei, ... Self-confident dynasties risk new names, ... If Wills feels the monarchy is secure when his kids are born, ...
      (alt.talk.royalty)
    • RE: IIS
      ... Apache isn't more secure than IIS. ... Charles ... Standard & Poor's ...
      (Security-Basics)
    • Re: [SLE] /etc/hosts.deny
      ... It is actually more secure to use: ... For syntax please refer to: ... Charles ...
      (SuSE)