Re: CGI security vs ASP security
From: Rodriguez, Manuel (Manuel.Rodriguez@t-systems.com)
Date: 04/15/03
- Previous message: Adam Richardson: "Re: Firewall on Mac OS X"
- Maybe in reply to: Teodorski, Chris: "CGI security vs ASP security"
- Next in thread: Kline, Nathan C - CIEP-3: "RE: CGI security vs ASP security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Rodriguez, Manuel" <Manuel.Rodriguez@t-systems.com> To: security-basics@securityfocus.com Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 07:26:46 +0200
On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 12:52:19PM -0400, Teodorski, Chris wrote:
> I am looking for some opinions on whether ASP is inherently more
> secure than CGI? Or is it just easier to implement ASP
> securely......and securing CGI takes work and knowledge.......
------------------------------------------------------------------
The Question is, how you secure your source. I think a well secured
Website in ASP or ASP.NET is a good turn for you.
PEARL is a older Language an secure, too. Think about what you want
to develop. A Client - Server Application, xTier or a personal
website...
Greetings
Manuel Rodriguez, MCP
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training Europe, May 12-15 in Amsterdam, the
world's premier event for IT and network security experts. The two-day
Training features 6 hand-on courses on May 12-13 taught by professionals.
The two-day Briefings on May 14-15 features 24 top speakers with no vendor
sales pitches. Deadline for the best rates is April 25. Register today to
ensure your place. www.blackhat.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message: Adam Richardson: "Re: Firewall on Mac OS X"
- Maybe in reply to: Teodorski, Chris: "CGI security vs ASP security"
- Next in thread: Kline, Nathan C - CIEP-3: "RE: CGI security vs ASP security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|