RE: Remote access solution
From: Daniel R. Miessler (danielrm26@hotmail.com)
Date: 01/31/03
- Previous message: Valter Santos: "Re: Monitoring office web use"
- In reply to: Orlando J. Cano: "Remote access solution"
- Next in thread: Danny: "RE: Remote access solution"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Daniel R. Miessler" <danielrm26@hotmail.com> To: "'Orlando J. Cano'" <ojcano@scif.com>, <security-basics@securityfocus.com> Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 18:57:32 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> I was wondering if this securityfocus community could
> elaborate on how secure VNC, Freevision or Terminal Services are or
> better yet recommend another solution.
If you are running Terminal Services on 2000 and you set your
encryption to 128 bit I think you will have a reasonably secure
remote access solution. I don't recommend VNC or any of the others
if you have Terminal Services.
For command line administration of *nix machines you should use SSH.
Regards,
- -Daniel
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0
iQA/AwUBPjm71FJwf7WiYT5vEQIT8wCgv5gKZJYj7YLjkh2Qtn4U8wJSNR0AoIuf
tFTxR+iIfQbXaap4EHe5Apcm
=3EzX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Next message: Vincent: "Re: Yet another syslog question"
- Previous message: Valter Santos: "Re: Monitoring office web use"
- In reply to: Orlando J. Cano: "Remote access solution"
- Next in thread: Danny: "RE: Remote access solution"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
