RE: RE: Wireless security and VPN

From: Jeffrey Eliasen (jelias@microsoft.com)
Date: 11/26/02

  • Next message: Noah Salzman: "Re: PGP Backdoor"
    Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 09:38:51 -0800
    From: "Jeffrey Eliasen" <jelias@microsoft.com>
    To: <peter.ve@pandora.be>, "Robinson, Sonja" <SRobinson@HIPUSA.com>, "Chris Martin" <chris.martin@smartech.com.au>, "Brian Bettger" <brianb@diversint.com>
    
    

    Or IPSec alone. If you are not concerned with bandwidth issues from
    wardrivers using your wireless network to access the outside world then
    IPSec alone is enough to secure all your network data. A side benefit is
    that visitors can use the network without network credentials to see the
    outside world, but the internal network traffic will be beyond their
    ability to watch.

    ------------------------------------
    jeffrey k eliasen

    -----Original Message-----
    From: peter.ve@pandora.be [mailto:peter.ve@pandora.be]
    Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 2:34 AM
    To: Robinson, Sonja; 'Chris Martin'; Brian Bettger
    Cc: security-basics@securityfocus.com
    Subject: Re: RE: Wireless security and VPN

    what about the new PEAP protocol ?

    ------------------------
     "Robinson, Sonja" <SRobinson@HIPUSA.com> wrote:
    ------------------------
            
    >802.11b which is used by current wireless devise is inherently insecure
    and
    >WEP is NOT secure. It is imperative that you use VPN to secure any
    >transmissions. Also, make sure that all defaults are turned off/changed
    and
    >lock down the SSID as much as possible. That is unless you want to be
    war
    >driven and cracked. There will be some new products out shortly
    (1/2Q2003)
    >that will be much more secure for wireless however, a GOOD VPN set up
    will
    >mitigate most current issues.
    >
    >Netstumber is a great war driver.
    >
    >-----Original Message-----
    >From: Chris Martin [mailto:chris.martin@smartech.com.au]
    >Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 8:18 PM
    >To: Brian Bettger
    >Cc: security-basics@securityfocus.com
    >Subject: RE: Wireless security and VPN
    >
    >The 802.11x (I think that's what it's called) system may be what you
    are
    >looking for. This system utilises the client authenticating to a RADIUS
    >server via EAP. Most Cisco wireless gear has this WEP type (called
    >LEAP). It's quite strong and the keys change regularly at predetermined
    >intervals.
    >
    >Even if you use VPN stuff like L2TP or PPTP you'll still have an
    >authentication process, however LEAP/802.11x integrates all that very
    >seamlessly.
    >
    >Hope this helps,
    >
    >Chris Martin
    >
    >-----Original Message-----
    >From: Brian Bettger [mailto:brianb@diversint.com]
    >Sent: Friday, 15 November 2002 4:12 AM
    >To: security-basics@securityfocus.com
    >Subject: Wireless security and VPN
    >
    >Hello,
    >
    >I am searching for a product that incorporates a Wireless Access Point
    >AND VPN authentication to use for nearly all of our wireless rollouts.
    >As you know SSID and WEP are possibly not enough to keep people out of
    >networks. An integrated VPN authentication after SSID and WEP, BUT
    >before network authentication would be REALLY nice. In other words, I
    >turn on my laptop, PDA or workstation, it establishes the primary
    >connection through the use of SSID and WEP, then stops, leaving port
    >1723 open, dropping all other traffic or attack attempts until I make a
    >secure VPN connection. As soon as I establish the VPN connection I am
    >then prompted (or not) with my NT, Novell, or whatever login.
    >
    >The thought is, a war driver could possibly crack WEP, access to the
    WAP
    >but is then faced with needing to establish a VPN connection even
    before
    >he can gain information about the network. The war driver / cracker
    >could only scan and see port 1723.
    >
    >Please pass this on as a request for development if possible. Another
    >point is that it would be nice to have this bundled into one appliance.
    >Additionally pass this on to anyone else you feel may help.
    >
    >Yes, I have looked into Proxim's solution, but it is over priced for my
    >clients (SOHO to medium size business, 25-100 users) and requires two
    >appliances, the WAP and then the VPN appliance.
    >
    >
    >Brian Bettger
    >Systems Engineer
    >Diversint, Inc.
    >Diversified Internet Services Group
    >
    >360-404-2044
    >
    >www.diversint.com
    >
    >Technology is Business
    >
    >
    >
    >**********************************************************************
    >This message is a PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL communication, and is
    intended only for the individual(s) named herein or others specifically
    authorized to receive the communication. If you are not the intended
    recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
    or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
    received this communication in error, please notify the sender of the
    error immediately, do not read or use the communication in any manner,
    destroy all copies, and delete it from your system if the communication
    was sent via email.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >**********************************************************************
    >



    Relevant Pages

    • RE: Wireless Security Strategy
      ... Use a VPN for all data traffic. ... From my perspective we are seriously considering creating wireless subnets ... would only be able to talk to a terminal/CITRIX server on the corporate ... wireless network and that would be in encrypted form due to the VPN. ...
      (Security-Basics)
    • RE: Wireless Security Strategy
      ... Make sure that all wireless network ... I'm new to this VPN lark.. ... >>would only be able to talk to a terminal/CITRIX server on the ...
      (Security-Basics)
    • Re: Secure workgroups!
      ... you're mixing threat models when you introduce theft of laptops. ... stolen set) then you aren't going to get very far into the wireless network. ... I try to avoid add-ons like VPN clients and such. ...
      (microsoft.public.security)
    • RE: RE: Wireless security and VPN
      ... It is imperative that you use VPN to ... >>that will be much more secure for wireless ... Most Cisco wireless gear has this WEP type ... > specifically authorized to receive the communication. ...
      (Security-Basics)
    • Re: Disabling VPN Firewall When VPN Is Not Running
      ... > please search on "Problems Setting Up a Small Wireless Home Network" ... > resulted in the VPN software not working. ... it was at the expense of having to uninstall my VPN ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.network_web)