Re: TCP vs UDP IIFrom: Alevizos Dimos (firstname.lastname@example.org)
- Previous message: Bill Hamel: "Re: Company Firewall's IP Address"
- In reply to: Pablo Gietz: "TCP vs UDP II"
- Next in thread: charles lindsay: "RE: TCP vs UDP II"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 23:09:29 +0200 From: Alevizos Dimos <email@example.com> To: Pablo Gietz <firstname.lastname@example.org>
I think it depends... I know for sure that ettercap (on linux) can
hijack a tcp connection and inject whatever data the intruder wants
(it's child's play for instance to hijack a telnet to a router and send
back to the operator fake answers from the router)...
But in order to do that it has to be on the same lan (it can work even
in switched lans) with one of the two machines...
If you're talking about some guy who's miles away to be able to hijack a
telnet connection from you to some other machine... i don't know... :-)
Pablo Gietz wrote:
>It's possible that a intruder could take active part of a TCP connection
>after this was established?
>In UPD I know this is true because is a connectionless protocol. But I have
>doubts about TCP.
>Pablo A. C. Gietz
>Jefe de Seguridad Informática
>Nuevo Banco de Entre Ríos S.A.
>Te.: 0343 - 4201351