Re: Ports->Process on Win NT/2k
From: R Pradeep Chandran (rpc@pobox.com)Date: 09/26/02
- Previous message: Rapaille Max: "RE: Computer Security News"
- In reply to: Francisco Bedolla: "Re: Ports->Process on Win NT/2k"
- Next in thread: Rahul Chander Kashyap: "Re: Ports->Process on Win NT/2k"
- Next in thread: Chris Berry: "Re: Ports->Process on Win NT/2k"
- Reply: Rahul Chander Kashyap: "Re: Ports->Process on Win NT/2k"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 12:27:59 +0530 From: R Pradeep Chandran <rpc@pobox.com> To: Francisco Bedolla <fbedolla@cotopaxi.isp.com.mx>
Francisco Bedolla wrote:
>
> you should read this
>
> http://online.securityfocus.com/infocus/1627
>
Read. Also read the recommendations of fport by others.
But, It doesn't work. :-( netstat -an shows a dozen (yes, I counted :-))
screens full (100x25 screens) of listening and connected ports.
fport shows none. This is what happens.
---- E:\Utils\Bin>fport FPort v2.0 - TCP/IP Process to Port Mapper Copyright 2000 by Foundstone, Inc. http://www.foundstone.comE:\Utils\Bin> ----
Any ideas? Should I reboot? Add a patch to WinNT?
Have a nice day, Pradeep -- Keep me away from the wisdom which does not cry, the philosophy which does not laugh and the greatness which does not bow before children. -Kahlil Gibran, mystic, poet and artist (1883-1931) R Pradeep Chandran
- Previous message: Rapaille Max: "RE: Computer Security News"
- In reply to: Francisco Bedolla: "Re: Ports->Process on Win NT/2k"
- Next in thread: Rahul Chander Kashyap: "Re: Ports->Process on Win NT/2k"
- Next in thread: Chris Berry: "Re: Ports->Process on Win NT/2k"
- Reply: Rahul Chander Kashyap: "Re: Ports->Process on Win NT/2k"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|