RE: Firewall problem
From: Garcia, Nicholas A (Nicholas.A.Garcia@disney.com)Date: 07/31/02
- Previous message: sta: "Re: Help with builing a Linux or BSD Firewall"
- Next in thread: Blair Rampling: "RE: Firewall problem"
- Reply: Blair Rampling: "RE: Firewall problem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 14:31:01 -0400 From: "Garcia, Nicholas A" <Nicholas.A.Garcia@disney.com> To: <dsardina@si.rr.com>, "Vasiliy Boulytchev" <linux@boulytcheva.com>, <security-basics@securityfocus.com>
It's funny cause someone posted this in an earlier thread. . .
http://www.securitywriters.org/projects/osscan/results.php
I don't want to sound like a zealot, but I do prefer to stick to
reproduceable data and not just popular opinion. Win2k outta the box
has as many holes (5) as Solaris 6 (5). After the latest security patch
on each platform, Win2k had 3 holes and Solaris 6 had 4. Win2k outta
the box only has 1 more "hole" than Sun's recently launched Solaris 9 on
its default install.
I don't know what the severity of these holes are, but those are the
numbers as these guys posted them.
-----Original Message-----
From: DSardina [mailto:dsardina@si.rr.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 2:45 PM
To: Vasiliy Boulytchev; security-basics@securityfocus.com
Subject: RE: Firewall problem
I agree with Vasiliy Boulytchev said in his last email, but, im sure he
knows what im about to say.
Just because you switch to "linux or a openbsd" from windows, doesnt
mean your "secure" right out of the box. Thats a total LIE, and I would
hate to see people being mislead.
Every operating system has its insecurities.
I dont care what OS it maybe. I would say "Windows" is a last choice for
a secure OS out of the box.
All I can say is your OS will be as secure as the administrator is.
Just my 2cents.
Stay Safe!~
Dominick S.
-----Original Message-----
From: Vasiliy Boulytchev [mailto:linux@boulytcheva.com]
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 4:05 PM
To: Ash
Cc: securitybasics
Subject: Re: Firewall problem
Well,
Forget Microsoft's suggestions about staying secure. Scratch the
costs of MS ISA server, or whatever they call that junk these days, and
install Mandrake, Suse, Red Hat :( , anything but winblows. I know
FreeBSD/OpenBSD blows tux out of the water, but you should start at
something simpler. Regards, Vasiliy Boulytchev Colorado Information
Technologies Inc.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ash" <ashcrow@phreaker.net>
To: "Chris Berry" <compjma@hotmail.com>
Cc: <security-basics@securityfocus.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 8:32 PM
Subject: Re: Firewall problem
> More information would be great. A short sollution would be to use
> OpenBSD pf. It not only has a good amount of documentation but is also
> on of the most veritile firewall solutions arround.
>
> Please give some more information on the configuration (like the rules
> implemented).
>
> Thanks,
> Ash
>
> ---
> Darkfire Secure Linux -- http://www.gnulinux.net
>
> On Tue, 2002-07-23 at 12:11, Chris Berry wrote:
> >
> >
> > We're using MS ISA server as our firewall. In accordance with
> > their best practices recommendation I've put it on a dual-homed
> > machine and
set
> > up only the external interface with a default gateway. Our internet
> > connection is working well, and as far as I can tell reasonably
> > secure. However we can't connect telnet traffic, nor can I ping
> > internet sites, even though I have rules configured that should
allow this.
> > Previously all of this worked but people without a proxy client
could
> > still connect to the internet which we didn't want. I might be able
> > to reconfigure the routing tables to allow that kind of traffic but
> > I'm not sure thats the right solution. My terminal emulator program
> > doesn't natively support proxies. We're on a very limited budget so
> > any
solution
> > I find probably has to be free. Does anyone have any suggestions or
> > do you need more information?
>
>
>
>
- Previous message: sta: "Re: Help with builing a Linux or BSD Firewall"
- Next in thread: Blair Rampling: "RE: Firewall problem"
- Reply: Blair Rampling: "RE: Firewall problem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|