Re: Hyena v4.2...
From: Bob Wright (wright@isoblock.com)Date: 07/29/02
- Previous message: Mike Kleviansky: "Re: [fw-wiz] PIX vs Checkpoint vs Sonicwall vs Netscreen - comments?"
- In reply to: jack_mccarthy8@hushmail.com: "Hyena v4.2..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2002 23:39:55 -0400 To: security-basics@securityfocus.com From: Bob Wright <wright@isoblock.com>
Hyena is one of my all-time favorite admin utilities. While it isn't a
"hacker tool"
it can tell you a good bit about your environment even if you aren't using
it under
an administrator level account. It integrates well with Exchange and
allows admin
of user domain and Exchange mail accounts at the same time.
Hope it works as well for you as it has for me...
hth
At 05:12 AM 7/27/2002 -0700, you wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>We will be trialing Hyena v4.2 soon and was just wondering if anyone has
>heard or experienced any security related, or for that matter,
>compatibility related issue with Hyena v4.x? Will be used in an NT4
>single domain environment with Exchange 5.5, Citrix, Norton AV Corporate
>Ed, about 50 servers with some of them located internationally.
>
>TIA
>
>- -Jack
>
>
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: Hush 2.1
>Note: This signature can be verified at https://www.hushtools.com
>
>wmMEARECACMFAj1CjgscHGphY2tfbWNjYXJ0aHk4QGh1c2htYWlsLmNvbQAKCRAA6VKc
>ODqCXLLjAKCxw3xbrM5ohio+ct/2agEgWMva4QCgpelLzjS50cy6Co1QuSKrJe5EZ/0=
>=n6QM
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message: Mike Kleviansky: "Re: [fw-wiz] PIX vs Checkpoint vs Sonicwall vs Netscreen - comments?"
- In reply to: jack_mccarthy8@hushmail.com: "Hyena v4.2..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
