RE: NT/2000 vs Unix based Web Servers
From: Steve Bremer (steveb@nebcoinc.com)Date: 07/12/02
- Previous message: noconflic: "Re: security question"
- In reply to: Trevor Cushen: "RE: NT/2000 vs Unix based Web Servers"
- Next in thread: David Ellis: "RE: NT/2000 vs Unix based Web Servers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Steve Bremer" <steveb@nebcoinc.com> To: "Trevor Cushen" <Trevor.Cushen@sysnet.ie> Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 12:59:53 -0500
> Because if you are allowing port 80 through on your firewall and the
> web server is badly or insecurely configured then exploits like
> MSADC.pl can be used with ease against your web server.
This is a very important point here that Trevor has made. Your
"standard" packet filtering firewall can only protect those services
which you don't wish to expose to the Internet.
I say "standard" because you can use something like hogwash to
scrub out any malicious packets at your firewall. At this point
though, it may not be considered a packet filtering firewall anymore.
Steve
- Previous message: noconflic: "Re: security question"
- In reply to: Trevor Cushen: "RE: NT/2000 vs Unix based Web Servers"
- Next in thread: David Ellis: "RE: NT/2000 vs Unix based Web Servers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading