RE: 3DES versus SHA-1
From: Johan Andersson (Johan.Andersson@atremo.se)Date: 07/10/02
- Previous message: Frederic Baert Cen-IT: "RE: How to use tcpdump"
- Maybe in reply to: Mario Behring: "3DES versus SHA-1"
- Next in thread: Cam Turner: "Re: 3DES versus SHA-1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Johan Andersson <Johan.Andersson@atremo.se> To: "'mariobehring@yahoo.com'" <mariobehring@yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 10:23:20 +0200
Mario,
You should use an algorithm that is symmetric like DES, 3DES, Blowfish or
AES
(it will improve the speed) of you data transfer!
Sincerely
Johan
-----Original Message-----
From: Randy Williams [mailto:randyw@techsource.com]
Sent: den 9 juli 2002 17:42
To: SECURITY-BASICS@securityfocus.com
Subject: Re: 3DES versus SHA-1
From what I've seen and heard, SHA-1 is a slightly more robust protocol, but
opinions do vary.
Thanks,
Randy Williams
Systems Support Analyst
Tech Source Inc.
407.262.7100
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mario Behring" <mariobehring@yahoo.com>
To: <SECURITY-BASICS@securityfocus.com>
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 3:56 PM
Subject: 3DES versus SHA-1
> Hi all,
>
> The purpose is to transfer data between sites securely using emails, HTTP,
> FTP, IP (LAN/WAN), etc.
>
> Which algorithm should I use: 3DES or SHA-1 ?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Mario
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free
> http://sbc.yahoo.com
>
- Previous message: Frederic Baert Cen-IT: "RE: How to use tcpdump"
- Maybe in reply to: Mario Behring: "3DES versus SHA-1"
- Next in thread: Cam Turner: "Re: 3DES versus SHA-1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
