Re: 3DES versus SHA-1
From: strange@nsk.no-ip.orgDate: 07/09/02
- Previous message: Ulrich Keil: "Re: ipchains and bridging"
- In reply to: Mario Behring: "3DES versus SHA-1"
- Next in thread: Johan Andersson: "RE: 3DES versus SHA-1"
- Next in thread: Frank Chambers: "Re: Re: 3DES versus SHA-1"
- Reply: Frank Chambers: "Re: Re: 3DES versus SHA-1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 16:47:43 +0100 From: strange@nsk.no-ip.org To: SECURITY-BASICS@securityfocus.com
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 12:56:54PM -0700, Mario Behring wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The purpose is to transfer data between sites securely using emails, HTTP,
> FTP, IP (LAN/WAN), etc.
>
> Which algorithm should I use: 3DES or SHA-1 ?
>
3DES or both, never only SHA-1.
3DES is a block cipher while SHA-1 is a message digest algorithm, so you
should sign the data with SHA-1 and encrypt it with 3DES (or Blowfish,
Twofish, AES, etc.).
Regards,
Luciano Rocha
- Previous message: Ulrich Keil: "Re: ipchains and bridging"
- In reply to: Mario Behring: "3DES versus SHA-1"
- Next in thread: Johan Andersson: "RE: 3DES versus SHA-1"
- Next in thread: Frank Chambers: "Re: Re: 3DES versus SHA-1"
- Reply: Frank Chambers: "Re: Re: 3DES versus SHA-1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|