NT/2000 vs Unix based Web Servers

From: Mario Behring (mariobehring@yahoo.com)
Date: 07/08/02 

Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 07:25:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mario Behring <mariobehring@yahoo.com>
To: security-basics@securityfocus.com

Hi list,

I have some websites running on Microsoft IIS on NT/2000 servers and I
have to justify a possible change to Unix servers running Apache or
IPlanet using CORBA. The reason is only one, more secure web servers and
more secure web sites.

Can you guys give me your opinion and some arguments whether should I do
this change or not ?? Costs are not an issue here, please give me
technical and security arguments.

Thanks in advance.

Mario Behring

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free
http://sbc.yahoo.com

Relevant Pages

  • Re: NT/2000 vs Unix based Web Servers
    ... >One of the biggest failures in web site security is that you have to ... >>I have some websites running on Microsoft IIS on NT/2000 servers and ... more secure web ... >>Sign up for SBC Yahoo! ...
    (Security-Basics)
  • Re: OE has stopped sending & receiving
    ... I also got a new error while trying to send email via yahoo just now. ... Unlike SBC Yahoo! ... So I don't know what your mail servers should ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6_outlookexpress)
  • RE: NT/2000 vs Unix based Web Servers
    ... I would say that you should run the web server on the Operating system ... NT/2000 vs Unix based Web Servers ... more secure web ...
    (Security-Basics)
  • RE: NT/2000 vs Unix based Web Servers
    ... Because if you are allowing port 80 through on your firewall and the web ... NT/2000 vs Unix based Web Servers ... more secure web ...
    (Security-Basics)
  • sunfire 280R problems.
    ... I have two sunfire 280R servers. ... I'm installing Raid Manager 6.22.1 on both the ... ok> setenv use-nvmrarc? ... SBC Yahoo! ...
    (SunManagers)