Re: can someone decipher this?

From: Stef (stefmit@starband.net)
Date: 06/27/02


From: Stef <stefmit@starband.net>
To: security-basics@securityfocus.com
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 21:57:16 -0500

NEVER IGNORE SPAM!
And if you really want to save yourself some time in dechipering these,
you can use either the free reporting or the much better $30/yr tools
and mail filtering and reporting at:
www.spamcop.net
Just run ALL headers and the WHOLE body of the message through their
spam reporting tool, and you'll get back everything you needed.

Stef

On Wednesday 26 June 2002 03:47 am, Johan De Meersman wrote:
> It's called SPAM, and one usually ignores it :)
<snip>
> rcahanap@prodigy.net wrote:
> >Someone's been sending me these HTML type email with the IFRAME type
> > tags. Here is one of the headers from the email. It seems that it
> > is coming from some person with an account at USM.EDU named
> > J.MARSHAK (all of the emails have the same type of heading). Can
> > someone explained some, if not all of these heading information. (I
> > purposely put XXXXXX@XXXXXX.COM to hide my personal information.)
> >
> >Thank you in advance.
> >
> >-Roberto
> >
> >-----------------------------------------------------
> >
> >Received: from ocean.otr.usm.edu ([131.95.82.42]) by
> >trinity.infinethosting.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.4905);
> > Mon, 24 Jun 2002 13:44:41 -0500
> >Received: from Vcc ([131.95.135.162])
> > by ocean.otr.usm.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g5OIgo231905
> > for <XXXXXXX@XXXXXXX.com>; Mon, 24 Jun 2002 13:42:55 -0500
> >Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 13:42:55 -0500
> >Message-Id: <200206241842.g5OIgo231905@ocean.otr.usm.edu>
>
> From: tommyd <tommyd@webzone.net>
>
> >To: XXXXXX@XXXXXX.com
> >Subject: A special nice game
> >MIME-Version: 1.0
> >Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> > boundary=O99lPXpKQzJDT73H4
> >Return-Path: j.marshak@usm.edu
> >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Jun 2002 18:44:41.0206 (UTC)
> >FILETIME=[3333E160:01C21BAF]
> >--------------------------------------------------------



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Paging plus. net and F9 newserver users.
    ... business simply is not>> worth the effort but that won't happen ... How does reporting it make more work for the spammers? ... the spam and then click delete. ... and the bulk of people won't bother either. ...
    (uk.rec.motorcycles)
  • Re: Spam Re: TOP20BONUSES.COM - Online Signup Bonuses and Promotions for Online Poker, Online
    ... > due to the spam reports. ... > If Spamcop wasn't effective people would stop reporting through ... >> of downloading the headers for such messages has long since ceased to ... > be aware most host spam filtering software removes many of your ...
    (rec.gambling.lottery)
  • Re: Massive increase of spam on debian-*@l.d.o
    ... >> I'm reporting the spam. ... Most well-run ISPs ignore Spamcop reports. ... Over 90% of the spam I'm getting/blocking is relayed through ... Complaining to Chinanet Guangdong Province is not effective, ...
    (Debian-User)
  • Re: Bogus abusive spam complaint from Robert Perkis REPORTED TO HIS ISP!
    ... Sorry about incorrectly reporting your illegal chain letter ... > Following my rant is a message that one of your users, Robert Perkis, posted ... It IS NOT SPAM. ... > Newsgroups: rec.gambling.lottery ...
    (rec.gambling.lottery)
  • Re: Goldbuyer voices his concerns
    ... the gold-selling spam in the game can be interpreted as consent from ... Blizzard, regardless of the TOS. ... The coming patch will take care of some of it, but the spam that annoys ... Have there be repercussions for falsely reporting another player. ...
    (alt.games.warcraft)