Re: most secure Unix typeFrom: Qv6 (firstname.lastname@example.org)
- Previous message: Muhammad Faisal Rauf Danka: "Re: don't deserve to be hacked?"
- In reply to: Josh Glover: "Re: most secure Unix type"
- Next in thread: Michael H. Warfield: "Re: most secure Unix type"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Qv6 <email@example.com> To: Josh Glover <firstname.lastname@example.org>, jeremy <email@example.com> Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 19:38:09 -0400
On Thursday 13 June 2002 12:44 pm, Josh Glover wrote:
> Paranoia certainly *can* be a healthy thing, but in this case, you are
> making an assumption that the government gives a damn about what is on
> your box, which it almost certainly does not, unless you have a Muslim
> name. Also, according to their license page, the NSA releases SELinux
> under the GPL (or, in some cases, the BDSL), so that means the source is
Paranoia sure is a healthy thing, very healthy. GPL or not, I'll not feel
comfy using SE Linux when I can get me a Mandrake or SuSE and batten it down
myself. For the same reason that I will not feel comfortable hiring a known
child molester to baby-seat my kids.