RE: banned sites lists!
From: Steve Drees (drees@rangebroadband.com)Date: 05/30/02
- Previous message: vkp: "Re: Securing Cisco Switches - Hints wanted!"
- In reply to: Chisholm Wildermuth: "RE: banned sites lists!"
- Next in thread: Chisholm Wildermuth: "RE: banned sites lists!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Steve Drees" <drees@rangebroadband.com> To: "Chisholm Wildermuth" <cwildermuth@dbwebnet.net>, "BRAD GRIFFIN" <b.griffin@cqu.edu.au>, <security-basics@securityfocus.com> Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 13:19:25 -0500
> Maybe I'm misunderstanding what you're saying ("listing is used
> so that folks
> can modify their hosts file")....but I _WOULD NOT EVER_ put
> anything with one
> thousand one hundred and ninety eight lines as my host file. MS even
> recommends you not use the template host file with comments
> because that's an
> extra 20 lines that the OS must sift through before getting to the good
> stuff. Can you imagine the latency of windows having to go through that
> many lines (13,198) of a host file before it decides it needs to
> go out to a
> DNS server and look something up??
Local I/O is still several orders of magnitude faster than the average users
internet connection.
- Previous message: vkp: "Re: Securing Cisco Switches - Hints wanted!"
- In reply to: Chisholm Wildermuth: "RE: banned sites lists!"
- Next in thread: Chisholm Wildermuth: "RE: banned sites lists!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|