Re: about shell's
From: TheFinn (thefinn@ar.com.au)Date: 05/04/02
- Previous message: jhobbs2@tampabay.rr.com: "RE: strong encryption - governments denying individuals the right to use"
- In reply to: Matias C. Szmulewiez: "about shell's"
- Next in thread: Matias C. Szmulewiez: "Re: about shell's"
- Reply: Matias C. Szmulewiez: "Re: about shell's"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: TheFinn <thefinn@ar.com.au> To: "Matias C. Szmulewiez" <matiassz@uolsinectis.com.ar> Date: Sat, 4 May 2002 09:48:56 +1000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Sat, 4 May 2002 05:27, you wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Anyone know a shell (for linux) more secure or whit more security rules
> better than bash or rbash?
>
> Thanks in advanced
>
>
> Matias
bash + bofh patches. (there's tcsh bofh too) Best I know of.
If you want SHELL security in total, then you're looking at kernel patches to
stop/limit certain behaviour(s).
L8r,
TF
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8
iQEVAwUBPNMh6U5qlETwQXVPAQH7swf/f/Q5tuZs7o5qONJ5OCnBgXSYTfCllo8g
0SJEjnYKI43lDmr2oKFXf5hmbGdKpon5zQh+9pEomfwky1xJoMxHmdSafPDEEFDB
+EE2obBB4ESFj6JlXpPeTvwqQB8e+f6itZXudv3x7Uh2HkYQMIvmhcc73ZAss725
KXAYlRc/s3r+gGlUcEu1i+Uw63E5UWH97U6MLRoZVbE6+lh90TwEUpBirV26+WBT
IL6T+oT3MSHZ3BNrLPBufeE5d6t/WgQ2Y8t7AjvtIsllyrsdIHe3r02DY8R6YSdy
8WXSC7mhOa+W/Qy+LPEBQY3Lvc5o5jOEJaHjC8W6Lj52HjOZe9Osaw==
=RxMX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message: jhobbs2@tampabay.rr.com: "RE: strong encryption - governments denying individuals the right to use"
- In reply to: Matias C. Szmulewiez: "about shell's"
- Next in thread: Matias C. Szmulewiez: "Re: about shell's"
- Reply: Matias C. Szmulewiez: "Re: about shell's"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|