Re: Apple vs. MS - more secure?
From: Ash (ashcrow@phreaker.net)Date: 03/30/02
- Previous message: Mark Medici: "RE: RE: Disk Wiping Utilities"
- In reply to: Justin Kremer: "Apple vs. MS - more secure?"
- Next in thread: Vaughan, Ben: "RE: Apple vs. MS - more secure?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2002 00:36:47 -0500 From: Ash <ashcrow@phreaker.net> To: Justin Kremer <jkremer@wi.rr.com>
IMHO I would say OS X is more secure by default. While both can be beat
into submission (and it does take some beating and patches for XP :-D)
Apple has done a pretty good job. The whole idea of taking a open
base/kernel and build on top of it helps add a little more security
because of the many eyes idea. And if you want to you can install gcc
and compile some of the general Unix/Linux tools for security and
security checking.
I must point out I think that OpenBSD is the most secure out of the box.
Justin Kremer wrote:
>Just curious what you all think about the new Mac OS X. Which is more
>secure out-of-box; Windows XP or Mac OS X?
>
>
>-Justin
>
>
>
>
- Previous message: Mark Medici: "RE: RE: Disk Wiping Utilities"
- In reply to: Justin Kremer: "Apple vs. MS - more secure?"
- Next in thread: Vaughan, Ben: "RE: Apple vs. MS - more secure?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|