Alternatives to Kerberos
From: Jason Lewis (jlewis@packetnexus.com)Date: 03/03/02
- Previous message: Thomas Madhavan: "Re: Basic setup for a home RedHat 7 box"
- Next in thread: Trevor Cushen: "RE: Alternatives to Kerberos"
- Reply: Trevor Cushen: "RE: Alternatives to Kerberos"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Jason Lewis" <jlewis@packetnexus.com> To: <security-basics@securityfocus.com> Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2002 01:04:31 -0500
I have been tossing around the idea of encrypting all my LAN traffic. I
have several Wireless Access Points that started me down this path. Cisco
is pushing VPN's for all wireless clients. So I started thinking.....
Kerberos will do this, but I think trying to get Windows 2K, Linux, Solaris,
etc. all on the same page will be a superhuman feat. What about IPSec? I
could setup VPN's for each server-to-client and server-to-server, but that
seems like a kludge.
Is anyone aware of software that will automatically negotiate a tunnel
between boxes? I am leaning towards IPSec, but will consider anything. I
am not looking at hardware right now, which may be the only solution.
In a nutshell, I want end to end encryption on my local net.....possible?
Jason Lewis
http://www.packetnexus.com
It's not secure "Because they told me it was secure".
The people at the other end of the link know less
about security than you do. And that's scary.
- Previous message: Thomas Madhavan: "Re: Basic setup for a home RedHat 7 box"
- Next in thread: Trevor Cushen: "RE: Alternatives to Kerberos"
- Reply: Trevor Cushen: "RE: Alternatives to Kerberos"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|