RE: Security for new small company
From: Vachon, Scott (Scott.Vachon@Paymentech.com)Date: 01/14/02
- Previous message: irado furioso com tudo: "Re: SSH Version question"
- Maybe in reply to: Ben: "Security for new small company"
- Next in thread: Gary McKinney: "RE: Security for new small company"
- Next in thread: owentoby@WellsFargo.COM: "RE: Security for new small company"
- Next in thread: Kleber S Oliveira: "RE: RE: Security for new small company"
- Maybe reply: Kleber S Oliveira: "RE: RE: Security for new small company"
- Reply: Gary McKinney: "RE: Security for new small company"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Vachon, Scott" <Scott.Vachon@Paymentech.com> To: security-basics@securityfocus.com Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 11:37:35 -0600
>In regards to your statement about a netgear router. A device that does
>nat and port forwarding is not a firewall.
It is not a "true" firewall, though it is marketed as one.
> Easily hackable.
Can you point us to evidence to support this statement ?
>There is no rulebase in one of those things.
Not true. The Netgear routers do allow one to implement a rulebase via the
CLI.
>You could easily get the cisco pix or as I prefer a checkpoint FW1 for
small business. I am very big on checkpoint and it has got a lot more
features then a cisco pix.
Easily get ? You are assuming that a small business can "
1) Afford a PIX or Checkpoint FW
2) Afford training so as to properly administrate devices from #1.
3) Afford to hire a person proficient on #1.
IMHO , a small business could do very well with one of the SOHO NATting
devices. They could further enhance the protection by ensuing all the host
systems have the latest patches, and up-to-date anti-virus software running.
Yes, you are correct that PIX and FW-1 are better but, the key word was
"small business."
~S~
Disclaimer: My own two cents !
- Previous message: irado furioso com tudo: "Re: SSH Version question"
- Maybe in reply to: Ben: "Security for new small company"
- Next in thread: Gary McKinney: "RE: Security for new small company"
- Next in thread: owentoby@WellsFargo.COM: "RE: Security for new small company"
- Next in thread: Kleber S Oliveira: "RE: RE: Security for new small company"
- Maybe reply: Kleber S Oliveira: "RE: RE: Security for new small company"
- Reply: Gary McKinney: "RE: Security for new small company"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|