RE: NAT, Internet access and security
From: David McGovern (dmmcgove@hotmail.com)Date: 01/10/02
- Previous message: suburbanrockits@cs.com: "Vendor Contract Computer Security Requirements"
- Maybe in reply to: Robert Clark: "RE: NAT, Internet access and security"
- Next in thread: Wesley Song: "RE: NAT, Internet access and security"
- Next in thread: Stuart C. Bruce
: "Re: NAT, Internet access and security" - Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "David McGovern" <dmmcgove@hotmail.com> To: security-basics@securityfocus.com Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 14:20:50 -0500
Being that FTP is one of the most insecure protocols, it might be a better
idea to use ssh.
Just a thought.
-Dave
>From: "Thomas M. Welch" <twelch@samcrc.com>
>To: "Kartik Trivedi" <kvt@eudoramail.com>, "irado furioso com tudo"
><irado@nettaxi.com>
>CC: <security-basics@securityfocus.com>
>Subject: RE: NAT, Internet access and security
>Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 17:58:23 -0600
>
>No Problem...
>
>Just map port 21 (assuming you are using port21) to your internal redhat
>box running the ftp daemon.
>
>It is also called port forwarding. When a FTP request comes to your
>router over port 21 your router will forward that request to the
>internal machine you specify.
>
>Hope this helps.
>-Tom
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Kartik Trivedi [mailto:kvt@eudoramail.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 5:05 AM
>To: irado furioso com tudo
>Cc: security-basics@securityfocus.com
>Subject: Re: NAT, Internet access and security
>
>
>hey guys,
>
>Any idea how can i run an FTP server behind a NAT.
>
>I share DSL connection with my roommates using a router. But i want to
>connect to my machine (RH Linux 7.2 which has an ftp daemon running)
>from outside.
>
>Any idea?
>
>Thanks
>-neo
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "irado furioso com tudo" <irado@nettaxi.com>
>Cc: <security-basics@securityfocus.com>
>Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 3:46 AM
>Subject: Re: NAT, Internet access and security
>
>
>surelly, I am missing something. In a widely open network as this, how
>can it be secure ??
>
>
>
>Iain McAleer wrote:
>
> > Hey guys,
> >
> > To be honest, if your system is secure a firewall is redundant. I am
> > aware of a company here in Perth that is part of a multi-million
> > dollar corporation. They have NO firewalls in place and are not
> > implimenting NAT. Infact they have live IP's for all their
> > workstations. The reason they
>have
> > no firewall and can keep running with this is because their system is
> > secure. The biggest security risk is always going to be exploits and
> > your own clients idiocy.
> >
>
>
>
>
>saudações,
>
>Irado Furioso com Tudo
>Linux (SuSE) User 179402
>se abrirem as portas de *todas* as prisões, os roubos ainda serão em
>menor volume do que os de nossos políticos. Na verdade, mal
>perceberíamos a diferença (think about)!.
>
>
>
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
- Previous message: suburbanrockits@cs.com: "Vendor Contract Computer Security Requirements"
- Maybe in reply to: Robert Clark: "RE: NAT, Internet access and security"
- Next in thread: Wesley Song: "RE: NAT, Internet access and security"
- Next in thread: Stuart C. Bruce
: "Re: NAT, Internet access and security" - Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|