RE: NAT/PAT (Hide NAT) Vulnerabilities?

From: CHRIS GRABENSTEIN (LFGRABC@lf.vccs.edu)
Date: 11/29/01


Message-Id: <sc0648f4.006@lf.vccs.edu>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 14:29:57 -0500
From: "CHRIS GRABENSTEIN" <LFGRABC@lf.vccs.edu>
To: <security-basics@securityfocus.com>
Subject: RE: NAT/PAT (Hide NAT) Vulnerabilities?

Preventing incoming connections will do a lot to improve your security,
but by no means is it a total security solution. An attacker could use
a web scripting vulnerability or email trojan to fool your internal
machine into establishing a connection with him. There are other ways
through, but I'm no security expert. We need to take a multi-layered
approach to network security. There's always a way in, we just need to
make it so hard that it's not worth the attacker's time.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dee Harrod <dee_harrod@yahoo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 3:14 PM
To: SecurityBasics <security-basics@securityfocus.com>
Subject: NAT/PAT (Hide NAT) Vulnerabilities?

This strikes me as somewhat of a bonehead question,
but it's something that's bothered me for awhile:
Let's say I have DSL at home. Let's also say that I
have a single public IP address, but my internal LAN
uses private addressing. The DSL router performs some
sort of NAT or PAT (probably PAT here). All my
internal machines can reach the Internet through the
DSL router, but when they come out, the source address
is changed to the public address. The ports are
managed by the router, so that it knows who's talking
to whom, and can thus properly direct returning
traffic.
Since someone from the outside accessing the router
itself would be a bad idea, say I'm blocking that.
Let's say it's managed by http, and I have a filter
rule that prohibits anything but my private network
from reaching port 80.
Now, for all intents and purposes, how vulnerable is
my internal network?
You can't start a connection with an internal system
because you can't reach its IP address. Even if you
did manage to hijack a session, of how much value
would it really be?
So it seems to me that if you use NAT/PAT, you don't
need a real firewall unless you're actually permitting
some kind of traffic to connect to something from the
outside.
Is that right?
   Dee
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! GeoCities quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month.
http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1



Relevant Pages

  • RE: Comments on 5 IE vulnerabilities
    ... For those who have opened up the Internet Options, ... Enterprise Security and Privacy Programs ... Despite the severity of some of the vulnerabilities posted by Liu Die Yu, ... I have locked down the My Computer security zone ...
    (Focus-Microsoft)
  • Re: IIS, homenetwork, teenager, sercurity
    ... Firewall. ... connection is giving you some hardware firewall protection. ... it is a good idea to have any PC that is connected to the internet ... Microsoft plugs their security holes with a patch ...
    (microsoft.public.inetserver.iis.security)
  • Re: pop ups from messenger services
    ... and Sasser Worms that still haunt the Internet. ... ignoring or just "putting up with" the security gap represented by ... Messenger Service of Windows ... firewall and WinXP's Internet Connection Sharing feature. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support)
  • Re: pop ups
    ... and Sasser Worms that still haunt the Internet. ... ignoring or just "putting up with" the security gap represented by ... Messenger Service of Windows ... firewall and WinXP's Internet Connection Sharing feature. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin)
  • RE: application for an employment
    ... As much as I dislike most of the laws covering these issues, I'm grateful for the discussion of them in this thread. ... But I'm no less of the opinion that the laws governing these aspects of cyber-security are biased in favor of large entities with elaborate online presences, and those people who serve them. ... The mere examination of the possibility of there being vulnerabilities in an organization's internet presence is virtually equated with the act of mailicously exploiting such a weakness. ...
    (Security-Basics)