RE: More about NAT
From: Jason Lewis (jlewis@packetnexus.com)Date: 09/09/01
- Previous message: Gertjan O. Kloek: "RE: More about NAT"
- In reply to: Muhamad Salem Sugui: "More about NAT"
- Next in thread: centipede: "Re: More about NAT"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Jason Lewis" <jlewis@packetnexus.com> To: "'Muhamad Salem Sugui'" <muhamad@directtalk.com.br>, <security-basics@securityfocus.com> Subject: RE: More about NAT Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2001 16:35:18 -0400 Message-ID: <001501c1396e$f11d4e60$4d78a8c0@spinalcord>
This link might help.
http://www.sans.org/infosecFAQ/firewall/net_add2.htm
Jason Lewis
http://www.packetnexus.com
It's not secure "Because they told me it was secure".
The people at the other end of the link know less
about security than you do. And that's scary.
-----Original Message-----
From: Muhamad Salem Sugui [mailto:muhamad@directtalk.com.br]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:30 PM
To: security-basics@securityfocus.com
Subject: More about NAT
I belived that I understood how NAT works. But I think not.
How NAT works exactly? How my computers in LAN can be reached from
outside world with NAT and without NAT?
Thanks in advance to everyone.
-- Muhamad Salem Sugui
- Previous message: Gertjan O. Kloek: "RE: More about NAT"
- In reply to: Muhamad Salem Sugui: "More about NAT"
- Next in thread: centipede: "Re: More about NAT"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|