RE: Remote control options
From: Andrew Blevins (ABlevins@arrowheadgrp.com)Date: 08/21/01
- Previous message: Devdas Bhagat: "RE: Firewalls in a K-12 [More info from me]"
- Maybe in reply to: Joost De ***: "Remote control options"
- Next in thread: Chris Eidem: "RE: Remote control options"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Message-ID: <234A38B183F6D3119EC80008C708924602F02012@ArrowMail2> From: Andrew Blevins <ABlevins@arrowheadgrp.com> To: 'Chris Eidem' <jceidem@dexma.com>, Joost De *** <Joost.De***@astrid.be>, SECURITY-BASICS@securityfocus.com Subject: RE: Remote control options Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 08:59:09 -0700
We also use VNC for all of our Remote Control options, with a little Win2K
terminal server thrown in the mix. VNC works great, has lots of options for
slow connections, and SEEMS pretty secure, as long as you don't leave it
listening for incoming connex.
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Eidem [mailto:jceidem@dexma.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 8:25 AM
To: Joost De ***; SECURITY-BASICS@securityfocus.com
Subject: RE: Remote control options
Well, I use VNC for all my remote connections and I've never been
disappointed. I don't think it's a big security risk if you have a VPN
up or you're inside your network. I will admit that it doesn't have the
granularity of control that you're looking for but it is handy since you
can run a server on unix or Windows and there are viewers for either
platform. You'll need to use the native Netware remote admin stuff
since I don't know of any NLMs providing VNC functionality.
Nice thing about VNC is that it is very lightweight, it doesn't litter
your windows boxen with DLLs all over hell and gone like PCAnywhere. No
file transfer, minimal authentication options, but for a small, fast
remote control, it can't be beat.
Did I mention it's free?
I have a Linux box running OpenSSH and I'm able to connect to it from
home and use its ability to redirect ports to all the servers (WinNT and
Unix) throughout the network. SSH covers the inheirent weaknesses of
the VNC password protocol (dsniff rips through it in a heartbeat...) and
helps compress the data stream of remote connections so it speeds up the
screen refreshes. It is actually functional (well, barely) over a modem
connection, so you may want to look into it
Get it here:
http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/
As far as hardware goes, we use a Cybex system. Really clunky, really
expensive especially for a glorified KVM switch. Why do I bring it up?
The will happily sell you a WinNT box with PCAnywhere that connects to
their KVM switch so that you can control boxes remotely. They also have
a KVM switch that will connect over TCP/IP for around $10,000.00. Eight
ports, $1,250.00 a port. Yeesh.
I like VNC. It's free...
Hope this helps,
Chris
- Previous message: Devdas Bhagat: "RE: Firewalls in a K-12 [More info from me]"
- Maybe in reply to: Joost De ***: "Remote control options"
- Next in thread: Chris Eidem: "RE: Remote control options"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]