Security of NAT on Netopia Routers?
From: Brad Cox (bcox@virtualschool.edu)Date: 08/20/01
- Previous message: Marc Perisa: "Re: Backup DMZ"
- In reply to: Albert Lederer: "RE: NAT - how easy to get past?"
- Next in thread: Mark Ng: "RE: NAT - how easy to get past?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 12:22:34 -0400 From: Brad Cox <bcox@virtualschool.edu> To: "Albert Lederer" <alederer@gatewaytel.com> Subject: Security of NAT on Netopia Routers? Message-Id: <20010820122234.669ff48e.bcox@virtualschool.edu>
On Mon, 20 Aug 2001 11:49:31 -0400
"Albert Lederer" <alederer@gatewaytel.com> wrote:
> NAT in itself is pretty secure, as it will only let IP sessions established
> from the internal interface to go through(in it's default setup), so it's
> pretty secure. I think with NAT you'd almost have to discuss a certain
> vendors implementation.
Does anyone have experience with the NAT implementation in Netopia's routers in the default NAT configuration? Mine comes up clean with the security probes I've thrown at it so far (Nessus, Symantec's, grc.com) but I'm far from a security expert.
This is their low-cost box with dual analog modems for external access.
I'm running Linux and MacOSX inside and all of which currently rely totally on NAT for security.
-- Brad J Cox, Ph.D. bcox@virtualschool.edu, 703 361 4751 For industrial age goods there were checks and credit cards For everything else there is http://virtualschool.edu/mybank Java Web Application Architecture: http://virtualschool.edu/jwaa
- Previous message: Marc Perisa: "Re: Backup DMZ"
- In reply to: Albert Lederer: "RE: NAT - how easy to get past?"
- Next in thread: Mark Ng: "RE: NAT - how easy to get past?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|