RE: Qmail vs. postfix
From: multics@ruserved.comDate: 08/10/01
- Previous message: Pete Sherwood: "Re: .htaccess - username/passwd"
- Maybe in reply to: McHugh, Sean: "RE: Qmail vs. postfix"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: multics@ruserved.com Message-Id: <200108101732.f7AHWFT18289@multics.ruserved.com> Subject: RE: Qmail vs. postfix To: security-basics@securityfocus.com Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 13:32:15 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Gary Wilson [mailto:gwilson@one2one.co.uk]
>
> That's intetesting... I was under the impression that a large cash
> reward was available for anyone proving any security issues with
> qmail and repeatedly exploiting it. I further understand this
> reward has never been claimed? Can you post details (URLs,
> case notes etc) of these exploits etc so I can check my own qmail
> machines.
There is a difference between a security exploit and a denial of service.
What you describe is a denail of service. The attacker does not get
any access to the system.
-- Richard Shetron multics@ruserved.com multics@acm.rpi.edu NO UCE What is the Meaning of Life? There is no meaning, It's just a consequence of complex carbon based chemistry; don't worry about it The Super 76, "Free Aspirin and Tender Sympathy", Las Vegas Strip.
- Previous message: Pete Sherwood: "Re: .htaccess - username/passwd"
- Maybe in reply to: McHugh, Sean: "RE: Qmail vs. postfix"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|