Re: A new virus? "ingin US kembali"

From: Wahyu Kelik (cahyadi@time.net.my)
Date: 08/03/01 

Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20010803085937.00a3a610@pop.time.net.my>
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2001 09:22:06 +0800
To: Michael Kjorling <michael@kjorling.com>, Security Basics <security-basics@security-focus.com>
From: Wahyu Kelik <cahyadi@time.net.my>
Subject: Re: A new virus? "ingin US kembali"

At Wednesday 8/1/01 12:36 PM (+0200), Michael Kjorling wrote:
>Does anyone know if this is a new virus, or what it could be? About
>all I can make out of the email is that it talks about the Kyoto
>protocol. (If someone here knows Japanese(?) and care translating this
>to English, I would appreciate that.)

I didn't know about that virus. But you received an e-mail in Indonesian
Language (not in Japanese). I 'll try to translate it to you (but sorry,
English is my second language).

> Received: from lab.kbri.or.jp (dns02.cts.ne.jp [210.254.75.2])

That domain, lab.kbri.or.jp is under Embassy of Republic of Indonesia in
Tokyo (Japan). I Think this documents should have confidential status.
Maybe it is a new virus related to Win32.Sircam.Worm? a new derivatived but
creative work? :-)
Because the body mail didn't have any clue as a virus. It just an
explanation about Kyoto Protocol.

>- ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2001 10:26:56 +0900 (JST)
>From: romsun <romsun@cts.ne.jp>
>Subject: ingin US kembali
>
>Utamanya adalah agar Kyoto Protocol tersebut dapat segera berlaku
>secara efektif. Hal ini memberikan indikasi bahwa Perancis akan tetap
>meratifikasi Kyoto Protocol tahun depan dengan ataupun tanpa
>keterlibatan US. Menteri Lingkungan Hidup Belanda, Jan Pronk, sebagai
>Ketua UNFCCC, pada hari kamis 5 Juli 2001 menyatakan bahwa salah satu
>'option' untuk dapat menyelamatkan Kyoto Protokol adalah dengan
>mengundurkan target waktu mulai pengurangan GHG selama dua tahun dari
>2008 menjadi 2010. Namun ide tersebut mendapat kritikan tajam dari
>environmentalist karena pengunduran target waktu tersebut sama saja
>dengan mengubur agreement, kata Kate Hampton dari Friends of the
>Earth.

The main objectives is to make Kyoto Protocol working/run efectively.
That's indicate that France will ratificate Kyoto Protocol next year with
or without US involvement. Dutch Ministry for Enviroment, Jan Pronk, as his
capacity as UNFCCC, at Thursday 5 July 2001 make a statement that one
option to safe Kyoto Protocol is by delaying GHG from 2008 to 2010. But
this idea have critics from environmentalist (K: Like GreenPeace??) because
by delaying is seems to be burring an agreement, said Kate Hampton from
Friends of the Earth.

regards,
-kelik-

Quantcast