RE: Qmail vs. postfix
From: Peņa, Botp (botp@delmonte-phil.com)Date: 07/31/01
- Previous message: Jeremy Foote: "RE: Remote Administration on W2K"
- Maybe in reply to: Uros Gruber: "Qmail vs. postfix"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Message-ID: <6B465F03D38ED411B1CA009027EE78A48BE511@BUGO-MAIL> From: "Peņa, Botp" <botp@delmonte-phil.com> To: SECURITY-BASICS@securityfocus.com Subject: RE: Qmail vs. postfix Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 11:37:02 +0800
We use postfix.
Very simple to admin, very simple configuration.
Very secure (the author himself is a recongnized security expert). I have
placed one postfix server facing the internet (for 3 years already) without
a firewall. It hasn't been down ever (hey, I am not challenging you guys. I
have placed it there in case our fw gets hosed. Currently it does bulk
mailing ;-)
Very fast, so fast that I have to slow it down (so to speak) since our
hardware was not catching up ;-)
Very clean and open code (if you know C, you'll appreciate it ;-)
HTH. note, this is just my comment on postfix.
-botp
-----Original Message-----
From: Uros Gruber [mailto:uros.gruber@sir-mag.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 6:47 AM
To: SECURITY-BASICS@securityfocus.com
Subject: Qmail vs. postfix
Hi!
can anybody tell me what to use. I want to have secure mail
agent.
Qmail or postfix.
-- thanks, Uros mailto:uros.gruber@sir-mag.com
- Previous message: Jeremy Foote: "RE: Remote Administration on W2K"
- Maybe in reply to: Uros Gruber: "Qmail vs. postfix"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
