Re: Remote Administration on W2K
From: Maarten Van Horenbeeck (maarten@daemon.be)Date: 07/30/01
- Previous message: Jeff Smith: "RE: Raw Sockets in WinXP"
- In reply to: Andrew Jones: "RE: Remote Administration on W2K"
- Next in thread: Kirk Ellsworth: "RE: Remote Administration on W2K"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Message-ID: <011001c11921$67489630$817ba1ac@BANSHEE> From: "Maarten Van Horenbeeck" <maarten@daemon.be> To: <SECURITY-BASICS@securityfocus.com> Subject: Re: Remote Administration on W2K Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 19:59:39 +0200
Personally, for remote management, I prefer using command-line tools which I
either pick up from the resource kit, write myself or find in the public
domain. Combined with the win32-port of the unix SSHD that gives me maximum
performance & less load on the uplink than a remote graphical interface.
And that can't be bad for a heavily used webserver, now can it :-)
Why should we use a graphical user interface for remote management... It's
slower, it takes up some bandwidth, and it most certainly has other
drawbacks, like load on the system. Above all of that, I personally think
that a command-line is much faster to get things done on ANY server,
including Win32.
Just my 2 cents,
Maarten Van Horenbeeck
maarten@daemon.be
- Previous message: Jeff Smith: "RE: Raw Sockets in WinXP"
- In reply to: Andrew Jones: "RE: Remote Administration on W2K"
- Next in thread: Kirk Ellsworth: "RE: Remote Administration on W2K"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|