Re: Remote Administration on W2KFrom: Denis Page (email@example.com)
- Previous message: Sean Rossi: "RE: Remote Administration on W2K"
- In reply to: Sawyer, John H.: "RE: Remote Administration on W2K"
- Next in thread: Gaydosh, Adam: "RE: Remote Administration on W2K"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Message-ID: <001801c1191f$a05fad70$0a01010a@page> From: "Denis Page" <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: <SECURITY-BASICS@securityfocus.com> Subject: Re: Remote Administration on W2K Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 14:46:56 -0300
use Netmeeting .. is more secure than VNC.
you can use crypto with netmeeting..
s----- Original Message -----
From: "Sawyer, John H." <JSawyer@mail.ifas.ufl.edu>
To: "'Brian McClory'" <email@example.com>;
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 5:30 PM
Subject: RE: Remote Administration on W2K
> Expanding on the suggestion of VNC, check out TridiaVNC and TightVNC
> They both add compression that works pretty well on slower connections.
> I would look into VNC by AT&T Labs. It seems to be very light weight, and
> most importantly has completely customizable ports, very important if you
> will be accessing through a firewall, and also adds a little security
> through obscurity. Also, VNC is open source under the typical GNU License
> and all the source is provided.
> Terminal services is something I strongly discourage. It causes
> load on the server. I have never been a fan of PCAnywhere.
> VNC: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/
> John H. Sawyer
> Computer Support Specialist
> Environmental Horticulture Dept
> University of Florida