AW: Remote Administration on W2K
From: Axel Westerhold (Axel@congos.net)Date: 07/27/01
- Previous message: Googi Singha: "Re: Setting local policies on Win2k"
- In reply to: o1o: "RE: Remote Administration on W2K"
- Next in thread: Michael Chernyakhovsky: "Re[2]: Remote Administration on W2K"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Axel Westerhold" <Axel@congos.net> To: "'o1o'" <o1o@oh2600.org>, "'Igor Kurtovic'" <igor.kurtovic@qsc.de>, "'Ryan McDonnell'" <ryan@ocwebsolution.com> Subject: AW: Remote Administration on W2K Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 22:14:49 +0200 Message-ID: <000601c116d8$cc202410$2cf0fea9@congos.net>
Actually Citrix doesn't work like Terminal Services but is based on
those. It is a extension to it. Also, it is thought to be used a base
for server based computing and is rather expensive to be used as a
remote management tool. Over here we use Terminal Services (in
Administrative Mode), Netop and PcAnywhere. Terminal Services work for
all normal work you have to do (user creation, password changes, etc.)
Sometimes you need access to the console. Then either Netop is used (if
we can persuade the customer to buy it, or PcAnywhere if the customer
prefers it.
Axel Westerhold
DTS Systeme GmbH
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: o1o [mailto:o1o@oh2600.org]
Gesendet: Freitag, 27. Juli 2001 18:38
An: 'Igor Kurtovic'; 'Ryan McDonnell'
Cc: SECURITY-BASICS@securityfocus.com
Betreff: RE: Remote Administration on W2K
Depending on everything you need, you may also be interested in citrix.
(http://www.citrix.com) which works like terminal services, but with a
Some other options added (for example, connecting to the client
computer's
Printer or drives.
----o1o
-----Original Message-----
From: Igor Kurtovic [mailto:igor.kurtovic@qsc.de]
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 5:40 AM
To: Ryan McDonnell
Cc: SECURITY-BASICS@securityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Remote Administration on W2K
if youre going to run W2K...
Terminal Services are better than most 3rd party tools. Its quick,
reliable, stable and "quite" safe to work with it over the internet,
even a 56k Modem has enough speed to work without major lags.
If you want to make it safer think about implementing a vpn solution to
access your Terminal Server or similar
Regards,
Igor
Ryan McDonnell wrote:
> I wanted to get an idea of what full-system remote administration
> programs people recommend for internet servers. Mainly I've found
> most use PCAnywhere or Terminal Services... curious as to which poses
> less of a security risk, quicker speed, server resources used, etc.
>
> TIA,
>
> Ryan McDonnnell
-- ********************************Igor Kurtovic NT Server Administration Internal IT QS Communications AG
********************************
- Previous message: Googi Singha: "Re: Setting local policies on Win2k"
- In reply to: o1o: "RE: Remote Administration on W2K"
- Next in thread: Michael Chernyakhovsky: "Re[2]: Remote Administration on W2K"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
