benign three-component attachment names (Was: Re: Win32.Sircam.Worm Alert.....)
From: Cole, Timothy D. (timothy_d_cole@mail.northgrum.com)Date: 07/27/01
- Previous message: Robert Claeson: "Re: Deploying a DMZ Internationally"
- In reply to: Meritt James: "Re: Win32.Sircam.Worm Alert....."
- Next in thread: Pete Sherwood: "Re: Win32.Sircam.Worm Alert....."
- Next in thread: thin-line@ftb.com: "RE: Win32.Sircam.Worm Alert....."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Subject: benign three-component attachment names (Was: Re: Win32.Sircam.Worm Alert.....) From: "Cole, Timothy D." <timothy_d_cole@mail.northgrum.com> To: vuln-dev@securityfocus.com, SECURITY-BASICS@securityfocus.com Date: 27 Jul 2001 16:44:09 -0400 Message-Id: <996266650.11479.2.camel@w784697.md.esss.northgrum.com>
On 27 Jul 2001 12:15:49 -0400, Meritt James wrote:
> Quite a few add the extension as a way of "hiding" what is going on, not
> just Sircam. If you get an attachment with THREE groupings, assume it
> is a 'bad thing' and act appropriately. Has anyone seen a three-group
> attachment and it been ok?
*.tar.gz
- Previous message: Robert Claeson: "Re: Deploying a DMZ Internationally"
- In reply to: Meritt James: "Re: Win32.Sircam.Worm Alert....."
- Next in thread: Pete Sherwood: "Re: Win32.Sircam.Worm Alert....."
- Next in thread: thin-line@ftb.com: "RE: Win32.Sircam.Worm Alert....."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]